Multinational corporations and China's own companies are setting their sights on the market sectors to move into once China enters the WTO. The Chinese media is calling this race the "enclosure movement" (圈地運動). But hidden behind this movement are China's immature, unstable market mechanisms and the moral crises facing Chinese society.
China's economy has avoided an all-out collapse by not strictly following Soviet-style "shock therapy" in its reform efforts. However, it has been implemented in some segments of the economy and, as a result, China is feeling some negative political and social effects. When it started down the path of economic reforms, China generated "instant capitalists" who amassed immense wealth overnight through their political connections -- just as the former Soviet Union was later to do.
Rampant crime, corruption among officials, complicity between officials and criminal gangs in the smuggling of contraband and massive piracy of intellectual property are all indicators of organized crime that have received relatively little attention so far.
The enclosure movement comes at a time when many of China's industries are still under government protection and before competition between local conglomerates has had a chance to intensify. The aim of the movement is simply political leverage. By relying on political power, all kinds of businesses -- both legal and illegal -- can generate massive wealth.
A speech by the late Deng Xiaoping (
When markets are still in their adolescent period, good political connections are the ticket to market access. After entering the market, some businesses will begin to reap profits within that framework. Others, however, will place risky bets and try to get rich quick.
The best examples are the numerous instant brand names that flood the China market. The media, unfamiliar with market functions, become mouthpieces for the promotion of these brand names. And because media hype is valued more than manufacturing and business operations, many of these brand names vanish just as quickly as they appeared.
This day-trader's approach to doing business has been the cause of chaos and uncertainty in the China market.
Many China-watchers overseas are shifting their focus to China's economic development. But the nation's economic statistics conceal the social crises hidden in Chinese society. Along with the introduction of a market economy, the social values that supported Chinese society in the past are disappearing.
Nationalism now serves as a foundation for unity and helps mitigate the grudges generated by the rich-poor and urban-rural gaps. Apart from this, the pursuit of individual wealth is the sole value underpinning Chinese society. But the pursuit of individual wealth also deepens distrust between people.
The absence of a reflective civil society allows the law of the jungle -- that of the strong killing the weak -- to prevail.
With China about to join the WTO, many Western scholars are bringing traditional relationships -- based on trust -- into market analyses. But they may find that Chinese society defies such analysis.
Hsu Tung-ming is a freelance writer based in Beijing.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry