Taiwan's accession to the WTO has generated a lot of excitement in the local media, which liberally uses terms such as "Taiwan has joined the age of global economics." Beijing has cramped Taiwan's diplomatic space for so long that maybe this sort of euphoria is understandable. But the anti-globalization movement rarely receives attention in the local media nor does the long-term social impact of entry into the WTO. Why not? \nTaiwan's media seem to approve of all the things Western media -- especially in the US -- does. This kind of political correctness means Taiwan ignores alternative voices in international affairs. \nFor a long time, Taiwan's international outlook has been limited to its relations with the US and China. Taiwan's media portrays the US as an important partner in maintaining Taiwan's security and as a country on which less developed countries can model their social systems. Within this framework, Taiwan has actually lost the ability to absorb the development models of other countries. \nSweden's high-tech industry, for example, could provide an important reference for building a "green silicon island." Another example is the way some European nations use their public resources to protect their cultures from becoming too Americanized. \nTaiwan's media are in danger of creating myths in their coverage of China, through their lack of an international angle. Consider politics, for example. Taiwan's media look at China solely from the perspective of cross-strait relations, rather than from China's role in the international arena. This ignores complex political and economic issues and clashes between interests within the vast country. \nIn an international context, the Taiwan question has always been a bargaining chip rather than a substantive issue in China-US relations. If Taiwan's media don't begin to analyze the situation from this perspective, they could easily be led to believe that when "Beijing sneezes, Tai-wan gets sick." \nMany in Taiwan's media are fond of quoting the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council (國台辦). But what roles does the office play in the numerous branches of China's central government? Are its power and connections on a par with other foreign affairs departments in China? Rarely does the media get to the bottom of questions such as these. \nTake China's handling of journalists from Taiwan during the APEC summit in Shanghai. Following a tongue-lashing by Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan (唐家璇) to questions raised by reporters from Taiwan, the Taiwan Affairs Office began to play a more conciliatory role, taking the journalists out for meals. Obviously, the office is more of a service provider than a policy maker. But Taiwan's media always quote "The Taiwan Affairs Office said ..." as the golden rule. \nThe media often forget their responsibility to look at the whole world from Taiwan's angle as they focus on Washington or Beijing. The media should monitor the social problems brought by the era of globalization instead of reporting only the good things. \nHsu Tung-ming is a freelance writer based in Beijing.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if