To be able to stay in control of the political situation in China after stepping down from his post, the general-secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, Jiang Zemin (江澤民), intends to imitate the US National Security Council system and has proposed the establishment of a Chinese National Security Council. It is reported that according to Jiang's thinking, the Chinese National Security Council will be a mechanism for planning and coordinating diplomatic and national security strategies, and he means to be its first chairman.
Under the American system, the National Security Council which consists of the president, vice president, secretary of state, secretary of defense, the head of the joint chiefs of staff, the director of the FBI and the national security advisor, is the US' highest decisionmaking body for national security policy. Informed people in Beijing say that the purpose of the National Security Council proposed by Jiang is, on the surface, to improve China's capacity for dealing with national security crises, but in reality it is an agency tailor-made for Jiang to stay in control of the political situation once he leaves the position of general-secretary. The agency is like a small Cabinet that can supersede the central government.
Informed people say that a recently published internal academic report strongly belittles the idea of a pre-eminent national security council. The report compares the power of national security councils and intelligence systems in various countries. The final conclusion is that the national security council may be established, but that its status should not exceed that of the ministries. The report is authored by a group of social scholars. Jiang suspects that the group is quietly being backed by Qiao Shi (
On a range of issues, many of the Chinese Communist Party's internal research reports are more outspoken.
A recent report from the Nanjing Military Academy, which is seen as the think tank of the Strategy Department at the General Staff Headquarters of the People's Liberation Army, clearly and unequivocally opposes the Communist Party's use of armed force to solve the Taiwan question. The report states that China should perfect its own economy to use economic means to snare Taiwan and give up the idea of unification through military force. The report estimates that if war breaks out across the Taiwan strait, the US would only have to mobilize one percent of its military force to assist Taiwan, in which case China would definitely lose the war. It is said that the report already has incited discussion.
Wu Suli is a columnist for the Hong Kong-based Open Magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry