After Taiwan was forced to pull out of the APEC leaders' summit, People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) criticized President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), saying he didn't know how to handle China. One can't help but wonder, surveying the cast of heroic figures on Taiwan's political stage, who among them knows how to handle China. Who is qualified to judge what constitutes "expert handling" in this case?
Former premier Vincent Siew (
Former minister of economic affairs Wang Chih-kang (王志剛) has also attended many APEC meetings. During a press conference at the Auckland APEC meeting -- when he was carrying out the same job as Minister of Economic Affairs Lin Hsin-yi (林信義) was in at Shanghai -- he let China's Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan (唐家璇) forcibly seize the microphone while he sat wide-eyed looking on. Wang didn't dare criticize what happened to Lin, having had a taste of such rough treatment himself. Wang said Lin had tried hard and done the best he could, adding that China has never passed up a chance to boycott or pressure Taiwan.
Former chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development Chiang Ping-kun (
Soong, however, served up criticism as though he was an expert on the subject -- even thought he hasn't had any experience in foreign affairs for over 20 years. He called Lin a "wimp," complained about "spendthrift diplomacy" (
During the era of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), then-finance minister Shirley Kuo (郭婉容) protested against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) by standing with arms folded during a meeting in Beijing. At least it could be said that she preserved some integrity for Taiwan. But by the second half of Lee's presidency, the strategy for dealing with China had developed to the point at which fighting was the only method.
Without fighting, could Tai-wan still hope to win concessions from the CCP? And wasn't obtaining diplomatic relations with other, smaller countries also the result of fighting? What practical benefit can a small country hope to gain by fighting with a superpower? Given the vast difference in the size between the two countries, if Taiwan doesn't want to fight, then perhaps the only path left is to surrender its land and title to China.
When it comes to "handling" China, don't talk about experts and novices. The situation is always larger than any single person. At least for the moment, no extraordinary talent capable of helping Taiwan cast off the dark clouds of the CCP has appeared. Whether chiding others for being novices or calling themselves experts, politicians have succeeded only in showing their own shallowness.
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Translated by Ethan Harkness and Scudder Smith
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.