Is a thorough reform of the KMT the only chance of avoiding a complete implosion now that it has ousted former chairman Lee Teng-hui (
The party's list of legislator-at-large candidates, which was announced on Monday, contains few surprises. It not only smacks of heavy compromise with local factions, it shows little of the creativity and vision necessary for an opposition party to expand its support base and seek government power.
Just looking at the top 20 names on the list -- those who are most likely to win seats -- we find seven incumbent legislators, three former political appointees, six from local factions and four relative unknowns representing the technological, cultural, business and military circles. While a couple of the overseas candidates do have good images, the list as a whole tilts heavily toward the same old vested interests. The KMT seems to have deviated from the very purpose of having a legislators-at-large system.
While the KMT has rarely been at a lack for words, the same cannot be said about innovative ideas to attract voters. There was a popular saying during the KMT's 50-year rule to describe the party's election strategy: "There's no guru to follow in an election; just buy it with money and you will win." The public impression of KMT candidates never went far beyond vote-buying and thuggish intimidation.
So how will the KMT be able to maintain its legislative majority after the December elections? Unless it is planning to tread the same old path of vote-buying, the prospect for the KMT's legislators is very dim.
What's even worse, the party has pinned considerable hope on Taipei City Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
But the KMT's rapid decline is not necessarily good news for Taiwan. It could very well be that a more cunning and ruthless wolf will supersede it -- although cunning is not a term that could be applied to many of the incumbent lawmakers. After all, if the Legislative Yuan continues to be occupied by the likes of the People First Party's Chin Huei-chu (
The people of Taiwan need to face up to the fact that the nation will never gain any kind of real political or economic stability unless voters take the responsibility to elect people willing to put the nation above self-interest.
If a party shows its contempt for voters by offering an abysmal choice of do-nothings, know-nothings and "reformed" thugs, then it should be voted out, not in. If a party offers nothing more than echoes of Beijing's propaganda -- vote it out. Only then can Taiwan have any hope of remaining free from exploitation and bullying by alien regimes.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry