The Chinese government has excluded the Swiss-owned bank Credit Suisse First Boston from a US$10 billion sale of Chinese company shares in an apparent move to punish the bank for helping Minister of Finance Yen Ching-chang (
The Credit-Suisse incident shows that the so-called "manufacture in China but process orders and do R&D, logistics and procurement in Taiwan" model is not feasible. It also shows the high risks facing Taiwanese banks entering China.
In fact, Beijing's move was to be expected. This author has repeatedly warned that it is not feasible to move production to China and keep logistics and R&D in Taiwan. It takes a massive amount of capital to build production facilities which, once built, don't move. But operations, like logistics and order-processing, can be moved overnight from Taipei to Shanghai once Beijing makes the demand. Who would dare procrastinate? Not Western companies, much less the Taiwanese.
Personnel, computers, mobile phones -- all these can be moved any time. Think about it. Will Beijing still let you process orders in Taiwan but carry out production in China by remote control after Taiwan has pumped its key production and capital resources into China? It only takes common sense to make a judgment on this. But business incentives cause people to lose their wisdom. The "westward march" clamor has prevailed both before and after the Economic Development Advisory Conference.
Also, the idea of building national security on the back of economic globalization is feasible only under certain conditions -- one of which is that Taiwan's economy must not be shackled to China's. Unfortunately, Taiwanese businesses both large and small are moving in the other direction.
Over the past 10 years, Taiwan has poured US$100 billion in investments into China. "March west" theorists apparently don't think it's enough. They blame the government for causing busi-nesses to lose opportunities.
Strangely enough, South Korea only invested US$106 million in China from January to May this year. At the same time, the closure of South Korean-owned factories and the withdrawal of South Korean capital from China amounted to US$101 million. So the nation's the actual net investment was only US$5 million.
But what about Taiwan? Taiwanese invested more than US$5 billion in China in the first half of this year alone (including the capital that entered China via the US, Hong Kong and Singa-pore). At a single meeting on Aug. 31, the Ministry of Economic Affairs' Investment Review Committee approved 17 applications for investment in China totaling US$152 million.
Is it that the South Korean businesses are so foolish that they are slow to take up positions in China? Why has South Korea managed to survive without going to China? It is interesting to note that South Korea, which has not boldly marched into China, posted economic growth of 8.8 percent last year, 3.7 percent in the first quarter of this year, and 2.7 percent in the second quarter.
In comparison, Taiwan, which poured US$10 billion into China last year and another US$5 billion in the first half of this year, saw a negative economic growth rate of -2.37 percent in the second quarter.
In tackling the global economic slowdown, South Korea's strategy has been to solidify its foundations and reduce investments in other countries. Taiwan is doing exactly the opposite,with its businesses demanding greater access to China.
Taiwan Stock Exchange Chairman Lin Jong-hsiung (林鐘雄) said recently, "It's absurd to say we can devise a mechanism to let capital flow back here." In fact, all this talk of a capital flow-back mechanism, of "doing R&D in Taiwan, manufacturing in China" is simply building castles in the sky. It was all cooked up to rationalize the "march west" policy.
Easing restrictions on investment in China will bring only result in the hollowing out and marginalization of Taiwan's economy. Once China has absorbed enough of Taiwan's capital and industries, once Taiwan's economy has been gutted, one order -- even one insinuation -- from Beijing will bring down all those fantasies about procurement centers, supply chain headquarters, orders and logistics and capital flow-back mechanisms.
If Beijing's recent move has inadvertently awakened the people of Taiwan and their policymakers, if it has caused them to abandon unrealistic fantasies and given them a thorough understanding of the need for effective management of investments in China, then that will be one big silver lining to the dark clouds over Taiwan.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor to the president.
Translated by Francis Huang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under