On Sept. 9, President Chen Shui-bian (
Looking at historical experience, reform committees organized by the Presidential Office have tended to be much more efficient than the those committees set up under the Executive Yuan's auspices. These precedents attest to the need for Chen's plan to control the reform effort himself.
Realistically speaking, it does take the direct intervention by a president or premier to coordinate the five branches of the central government, Cabinet agencies and local governments in order to fully implement reforms.
Where Chen's plan is troubling, however, is that the Cabinet's Research, Development and Evaluation Commission has proposed only a "partial" government reform, instead of a full-scale one. Full-scale reform would involve an overhaul of all government agencies; partial reform would involve a shake-up of certain Cabinet-level departments and agencies.
Can the government really improve its efficiency simply by reducing the 36 agencies under the Cabinet?
It should at least push for overall evaluations and reforms of the Legislative Yuan, the Judicial Yuan, the Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan, as well as local government.
There will inevitably be new problems for the government if central and local agencies' functions are not clearly defined as a result of a mere "partial" reform.
When promoting reforms in public administration, it is inappropriate to simply trim and merge agencies in order to reduce the number of public servants and increase government efficiency.
More importantly, evaluations of the importance of each agency should focus on the function of each one. A smaller government is not necessarily a more efficient one. If the government blindly strives to streamline itself, it risks giving rise to chaos.
A government is just like the human body. It is not good to go on a crash diet. Only by streamlining one's body shape according to each individual's needs can one's health be ensured.
The government also needs to look squarely at the issue of who will benefit from the reform. Will a streamlined government really benefit the public? Will the public receive better services? Can the goal of re-distribution of national resources be achieved? Can the income-gap between the poor and the rich be shortened?
These questions should not be ignored in the government's reform plan.
Since the ultimate mission of public administration is to serve the public, to seek its benefit, and to uphold social equity and justice, the government should consider the public interest as its top priority.
Perhaps Chen should invite community and non-governmental organization leaders to participate -- so that his reform committee will be able to hear the voices of both the authorities and the public.
Government reform has been discussed for years. It is exciting that Chen is willing to take action now.
Hopefully, the reform committee will come up with practical solutions and put them into practice -- so that talk of government reform will prove to be more than hot air, as has so often been the case in the past.
Chiang Min-hsiu is a professor of public administration at National Chengchi University. Yin Yi-chun is a secretary at the Taiwan Policy Institute Foundation.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under