A recent report by a US scholar disclosed that some of Taiwan's politicians traveled to China and asked the Chinese Communist Party not have any dealings with President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), so as to prevent Chen from gaining points at home.
While the disclosure may have caused some ripples in local political circles, it's no mystery that some Taiwanese go to China and kiss up to Beijing, offering advice about how to restrain Taiwan. Such activities only began after the Chen administration took power, but now that things have gotten so ridiculous that it is revealed to US scholars by Beijing -- one feels especially saddened and hurt.
Taiwan's "small versus big" relationship to China is disadvantageous. Taiwan faces a real military threat from Beijing. Only through concerted effort will it be able to successfully defend itself.
For many years, however, what we have seen is a divided Taiwan struggling to resist a united China. Politicians, interest groups and even political parties have selfishly applied pressure on the government to accept conditions proposed by Beijing. These entities will reproach the Taiwan government, saying that it must take responsibility for stalemated cross-strait relations, yet they never dare criticize or condemn Beijing's rude, rigid stance or threats to use military might. These people are a disgrace to Taiwan, and have absolutely no chance of winning Beijing's respect.
There is an American expression "politics stops at the water's edge," meaning that politics needs to have its limits. Foreign policy cannot become the sacrificial object of factional fighting. In foreign policy, there should be no "opposition." The nation's interests should be collectively defended -- anything else would be denounced in the media as being unpatriotic, and could possibly end one's political life.
Unfortunately, all too often we see some people in Taiwan take pleasure in criticizing their own government and policy in front of foreigners -- especially in front of China's leadership. We hope and trust the foreign scholar's report on this latest unpatriotic display does not reflect the policy of a certain local political party, but rather is only the actions of individual members of that party.
Regardless of what might prove to be the case, the revelation exposes an internal crisis in Taiwan, as well as the urgent need for ruling and opposition parties to seek and establish a consensus on foreign policy. If no such effort is made, Taiwan will slowly surrender itself piece by piece, eventually buckling under China's pressure.
Beijing has consistently adopted a "peace-war strategy" vis-a-vis Taiwan, excelling at "united front" warfare. These tactics succeed because of Taiwan's internal problems. It is only because some people do their utmost to sacrifice Taiwan's interests in order to curry favor with Beijing, that China's leadership is given a host of opportunities to exploit.
This is also the main reason why, for many years, Beijing has assumed such a haughty attitude toward Taiwan, refusing to restore cross-strait dialogue. If everyone in Taiwan put the country first and considered problems from the perspective of national security, Beijing's united front would cease to be effective. And once its two-pronged strategy of propaganda and military threats fails to scare us, China will finally begin to view Taiwan as an opponent worthy of respect.
Establishing a consensus on China policy is not impossible. At the National Development Conference (國家發展會議) held in December 1996, the ruling and opposition parties reached a consensus on 36 items, including developing cross-strait relations based on protecting national survival and development; development of cross-strait economy/trade taking political risks into consideration; opposing cross-strait relations on the basis of "one country, two systems" should be opposed; the resolution of direct links through negotiations at the appropriate time, in accordance with the principles of security and mutual benefit; and the government's creation of a carefully-planned policy regarding the movement of Taiwan enterprises investing in China.
The passage of time has not caused these consensuses to lose their value. The ruling and opposition parties can take the 36 items that were agreed upon in 1996 as a base and make progress toward reaching even more consensuses in the area of China policy.
On Saturday the ruling and opposition parties convened for cross-party negotiations. We hope that the negotiations will produce more than just arguments over how to yield to Beijing's conditions and promote the resolutions passed at the Economic Development Advisory Conference.
We also hope that there will not be haggling over how to divide political booty after the year-end elections. Instead, we hope that the negotiations will transcend the selfish interests of party factions, and proceed conscientiously -- with a responsible attitude toward future generations -- establishing a basis for Taiwan's secure, flourishing prosperity, as well as consolidating the consensus between ruling and opposition parties on China policy.
Lin Wen-cheng is director of the Institute of Mainland China Studies at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Scudder Smith
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry