In a day -- in Taiwan and in the US -- apparently bipartisan unity has been achieved for higher causes. In Taiwan, it took the form of a joint declaration by party leaders pledging speedy measures to revive the economy. In the US, a grief-stricken US Congress gave its president unanimous support to fight against terrorism with US$40 billion funding and an authorization to "use all necessary and appropriate force." However, a closer examination reveals while the US has truly accomplished national solidarity, the selfishness and egotism of Taiwanese politicians makes national solidarity virtually impossible.
Just three days after the horrifying attacks against the US, the US Congress approved a fund that is twice what was asked for by President Bush, and overwhelmingly approved a resolution authorizing a fight against terrorism.
National solidarity was being shown everywhere else in the US. On Friday, four former US presidents: Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford, and George Bush Sr, attended a national memorial service at which President George W. Bush spoke. In fact, just a few hours after the tragic attacks, Clinton made an appeal for the country to support Bush. Even Al Gore, President Bush's old election rival who lost by an unprecedented close margin, drove hours from Canada to attend the memorial service.
Back here in Taiwan, things are entirely different. Just hours before the meeting of the party leaders, PFP Chairman James Soong (
Soong finally decided to attend, but only to turn the event into a news conference for himself. Of all possible times and places, Soong chose this one to explain about his meetings with President Chen Shui-bian (
Soong did not forget to stab the KMT in the back to try neutralize any possible credit his former party might have garnered for hosting the meeting. Soong said some KMT leaders had cast aspersions about his motives for meeting with the president. KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Any hope for unity was lost when Soong began to criticize the content of the joint declaration before the ink of his signature dried. This is because the declaration calls on the government and opposition parties to resume negotiation based on the "result" of the "1992 conference," carefully avoiding the use of the word "1992 consensus." This is because the Chen Shui-bian administration and the DPP refuse to acknowledge the existence of such a consensus, under which supposedly the two sides had agree to the "one China" principle. Not long ago, Soong condemned the New Party for promoting rapid unification. Yet even the New Party agreed to the wording of the declaration, so why was Soong now taking an even more extreme position?
As for the KMT, any credit earned for holding the meeting was wasted by its refusal to invite the Taiwan Solidarity Union. Wasn't cross-party unity supposed to be the main theme of the meeting and declaration?
While Taiwan has certainly not suffered an attack as devastating as Tuesday's tragedies in the US, the country is nevertheless at a major crossroad. Any slip-ups could result in prolonged political chaos and economic depression. This country simply cannot afford the kind of selfishness that politicians have been displaying..
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry