Over the past quarter century, hundreds of thousands of students from China have studied at American colleges and universities. More than 50,000 were enrolled last year alone. That Western-educated contingent is China's best hope for intensified economic reforms and, someday, a more open, democratic political system.
Students educated at colleges in the US (and who often subsequently live in US communities for several years) are exposed to the full range of Western political and economic values. And they take that experience back with them to China. One would be hard pressed to find a more lethal, cost-effective way of injecting the virus of freedom into China's body politic.
Unfortunately, that great experiment is now at risk. In recent months, US embassy personnel have tightened their scrutiny of visa applications. Thousands of Chinese students, some with full scholarships, are being denied admission to the US. During one 5-week period in the late spring, 41 percent of all applications were rejected.
The sudden upsurge of exclusionary practices has already provoked angry comment in China, not only from the Beijing government but from the Chinese public. The sense of outrage is heightened because denials are often made after a hasty and superficial examination. Some decisions have apparently been based on interviews lasting no more than five minutes.
The reason for the change in US policy is not entirely clear. The official reason is that too many students remain permanently in the US instead of returning to China. A greater effort is being made to scrutinize visa applications to screen out more students who want to emigrate to the US rather than merely study there.
It is true that many Chinese students, having experienced the unparalleled freedom and economic opportunity of the US, choose to stay -- although that percentage has been declining in recent years. For Americans who view such expatriates negatively -- believing that they "steal jobs" from US citizens -- a decision to remain in the US is a serious problem. That mistaken view has probably received new impetus from the dramatic slowing of the US economy in the past year. Concerns about competition from immigrants always flare during times of economic stagnation or recession.
That factor alone may explain the increased hostility of US Embassy personnel toward visa applicants. But there may be another reason as well. It is possible that the jaundiced attitude is payback for Beijing's mistreatment of US scholars in recent months. The prosecution of several Chinese-American professors on apparently frivolous charges of espionage has clearly annoyed Bush administration officials. Tightening the visa requirements could be one way of conveying a subtle but effective message of irritation to the Beijing government.
Whatever the motive, Washington's policy is short-sighted and damaging. Those Chinese students who remain in the US become contributors to the dynamic American economy. Only people who foolishly view immigrants as economic liabilities, despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary, would fret about a decision by some of China's best and brightest young people to stay in the US.
Those Chinese who return home are also valuable. They are the agents of change for China in the 21st century. If they are successful, China will become a more prosperous and more democratic country. That change, in turn, would make China an easier international neighbor with which to live. The US State Department should not jeopardize such a worthwhile prospect because of a foolish change in its visa policy.
Ted Galen Carpenter is vice president for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry