The "no haste, be patient" policy has not only influenced cross-strait relations, but has been seen by the local and international business community as being the key factor behind Taiwan's economic downturn.
The main agreement reached at the Economic Development Advisory Conference -- to replace "no haste" with a policy of "proactive openness and effective management" -- is aimed at resolving the economic predicament.
The move has political implications. If the government is sincere in implementing the conference's consensus -- which would require it to cast aside long-held ideology in favor of vigorously promoting positive cross-strait interaction -- the termination of the policy will be the most symbolic gesture of friendship in the 50 some years of cross-strait hostility to date.
Now that the conference is over, the government and opposition parties need to carefully consider how to maintain and develop the goals of sustainable development and democratic politics.
As Taiwan has recently fallen behind in its economic development compared to China, we must count on the two advantages that Taiwan still possesses -- outstanding talent and a democratic political system -- in order to maximize the strategic benefits that would likely result from a relaxed China trade policy.
If we approach relations with China by focusing on long-term goals, both the government and the opposition parties must strive for the institutionalization of cross-strait integration and the evolution of democracy in China.
In the contemporary examples of integration in the West -- be it the EU or peace negotiations in Northern Ireland -- we have seen attempts to include members of hostile parties into the process through the institutionalization of cooperation mecha-nisms. By doing so the parties involved are able to establish commonly accepted rules and then are able to build on shared interests, which stabilizes the integration process. The process of stabilization ultimately leads those involved to believe that continuing institutionalized cooperation will be conducive to establishing mutual benefits, or reducing conflicts.
In contrast, there are only two semi-official organizations responsible for addressing the cross-strait impasse. Such a scope is far too narrow. To deal with new developments in cross-strait affairs, we should utilize executive and legislative talent, expand cross-strait cooperation mechanisms and establish models of interaction between government agencies -- ? for example, convening ministerial-level conferences on new issues as they arise.
The legislative branches on both sides of the Strait can also conduct cooperation on issues of common concern, such as economic resources, environmental protection and legal matters. Such cooperation would reinforce the legitimacy of the integration between the two sides. Although it would be naive to believe China's legislature has a significant influence on the country's policy, the interaction would nevertheless enhance mutual trust and have a positive effect on China's democratization.
In fact, the solution to the long-term cross-strait standoff rests on China's democratization. In the liberal democracies where public opinion easily influences government policy, we can see that those countries are far less belligerent than their authoritarian counterparts. Violent confrontations between democratic nations are far less likely to occur than between non-democratic nations.
Taiwan is already a demo-cracy. China can also become one. We must make efforts to facilitate China's political reform by strengthening the legitimacy of mutual cooperation mechanisms, safeguarding our values and securing regional stability.
The road to peace is always tortuous and fraught with setbacks. Responsible statesmen have to have a strong sense of vision. With its newfound determination to implement a policy of "proactive openness," Taiwan can take its first step toward using its advantages to begin building a cooperation mechanism that will lead to cross-strait peace and China's democratization.
Francis Yi-hua Kan is an assistant research fellow at the Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under