So, the infamous "Hwakang Wolf" isn't going to attend National Taiwan University (NTU) this fall after all. After months of media ruckus, this outcome brings a sigh of relief to many among the general public and perhaps even the "Wolf" himself. Whether they want to admit it or not, people are not ready to accept him back into society. The public will never be ready until a few fundamental questions are answered.
One argument raised by experts against placing the "Wolf" on parole is the short prison term he has served thus far. He received a 16-year sentence for committing 19 rapes and attempting 11 more. He has served six years or just one-third of his sentence, qualifying him for parole. As he has served under four months so far for each rape committed, these experts argue it would be wrong to place him on parole now. The argument presumes that the purpose of criminal punishment is retribution. Under this theory, the "Wolf" has simply not "paid his due" for his sins.
In contrast, other experts support placing the "Wolf" on parole, arguing that he has been successfully "rehabilitated." Some even appear to think that getting into NTU is in itself sufficient proof of rehabilitation.
Society needs to decide whether the purpose of punishing a criminal is for retribution or rehabilitation. If it is the former, then whether an inmate has successfully applied to enter NTU or been rehabilitated in the eyes of the judiciary, should not play any role in parole determination. In fact, parole should not be granted at all, as it allows wrongdoers to avoid rightful punishment. And if that is the case, society has no need to ever "get ready" to accept former rapists on parole.
If rehabilitation is the goal, then how much of the sentence the inmate has actually served shouldn't play any role in parole determination.
Perhaps, the goal of criminal punishment is a hybrid of both retribution and rehabilitation. Then how much weight should be given to each factor? Or does retribution play a particularly important role only when it comes to rapists?
This newspaper would rather believe that rehabilitation is at least part of the goal for criminal punishment. That being the case, the question becomes: Under what circumstances is this society ready to accept a "rehabilitated" former rapist on parole?
First, the general public needs to be educated about the value of rehabilitating former sexual offenders. Next, the public's fear of ex-offenders needs to be relieved. That can be accomplished only when they have learned to trust the ability of our criminal justice system to truly reform offenders, and, even more importantly, do a good job in monitoring and supervising former sex offenders on parole.
For example, it was revealed the "Wolf" received only about a year of psychological counseling in prison. Perhaps, the Ministry Of Justice could impose a longer period of mandatory psychological counseling for sexual offenders for whom parole is an option.
Upon their parole, ex-offenders could be required to undergo regular mandatory counseling as well.
In a bid to boost his chance of parole and entry to NTU, the "Wolf" went as far as to volunteer to undergo drug therapy to reduce his libido. Fortunately, the idea was not even considered by the authorities.
Such an idea is based upon the erroneous presumption that rape is prompted by the physical urge for sex. Studies have indicated that rape is often committed not to satisfy sexual urges, but rather to enjoy a sense of domination over the victim. Others suggest the root cause of rape is pure rage and a desire to inflict pain. Further chemical treatment, even if voluntarily accepted, brings up many complicated and sensitive human rights issues.
Perhaps it is better that the "Wolf" stays in jail for now. An unpredictable public, their emotions whipped up by the media frenzy over his possible parole, would likely make every day of his freedom a living hell.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under