Japanese prime minister Junichiro Koizumi's visit to the Yasukuni shrine has prompted criticism from other Asian countries, including China. However, China played a rather fuzzy role and shot itself in the foot by mishandling the matter. In the process, Beijing's behavior also reflected its complex emotions toward Japan.
Koizumi went to pay homage at the shrine on Aug. 13. On that day, Chinese vice foreign minister Wang Yi (王毅) summoned Japanese ambassador Koreshige Anami (阿南惟茂) and "made solemn representations," expressing strong indignation over the visit. Foreign ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue (章啟月) noted that "Koizumi finally gave up [the plan to] visit the shrine on Aug. 15, the anniversary of Japan's World War II surrender, and also issued a statement reiterating [Japan's] admission of its history of aggression and its willingness for deep soul-searching."
The Chinese public was infuriated because the ministry's complaint was called a "representation" and not a "protest," and because of Zhang's words of acknowledgment.
Why did Zhang say what she did? When leaders of the three political parties from Japan's ruling coalition government visited Beijing on July 10, Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan (
This was equivalent to tacit consent for Koizumi's visit. Thus, Koizumi avoided the anniversary and Beijing thought it came out the winner in the tussle. But the outcome did not satisfy the nationalism fomented by Beijing.
Even though Beijing asked Japan not to make Tang's two conditions public, Tokyo leaked the information anyway, deeply embarrassing Beijing.
The Chinese foreign ministry scrambled to deny the Japanese media reports, calling them "totally groundless."
However, an official at the Japanese embassy in Beijing told reporters that, while he did not know about Beijing's proposal to the Japanese party leaders, he did know that Tang had told Japanese foreign minister Makiko Tanaka during her visit to Beijing that if Koizumi must go to Yasukuni, then he must steer clear of Aug. 15. Apparently, Beijing had long surrendered its trump card to Japan and yet kept its own public in the dark about it.
Fearing that the matter might spin out of control, Beijing hit back on Aug. 16 through the Hong Kong media, denying that Tang had raised those two conditions with Japan. Rather, the reports claimed that Japan made a three-point proposal to Beijing over Koizumi's visit -- including an offer to steer clear from the anniversary -- and that Beijing "resolutely rejected" the proposal.
But if the foreign ministry had already rejected the proposal, how could Zhang have acknowledged the fact that Koizumi had avoided the anniversary? Also, Japan's pro-Beijing foreign minister Tanaka would not have remained silent if Tang's remarks had been fabricated by the Japanese media.
To slough off its "treasonous" image and to divert public anger, Beijing was forced to mobilize a barrage of condemnations against Japan.
These following facts reflect Beijing's extremely complex sentiments toward Japan.
First, Japan provides long-term, low-interest loans to China. Japan is also China's biggest creditor. Beijing's corrupt officials will not give up their love of money in favor of love for their country. Their vitriol against Japan is only meant for local consumption. The recent escalation of tongue-lashing is not directly related to Koizumi's visit. After all, two previous Japanese prime ministers have visited the Yasukuni Shrine while in office. In fact, Beijing's anger had to do with recent calls by Japanese parliamentarians and think tanks to halt economic aid if China continues its military expansion.
Second, during his meeting with a delegation from the Japanese Socialist Party on July 10, 1964, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) rejected their apologies for wartime Japanese aggression. Mao claimed that Japanese militarism had brought great benefit for China, and that the Chinese Communist Party could not have come to power if not for the Japanese emperor. If Mao were alive today and got around to visit Japan, he might also visit the shrine.
Finally, Beijing objects to the revisions made to Japanese history textbooks, but it has engaged in revisions of its own. Beijing has even revised the memoirs of its long-time friend Lee Kuan Yew (
Beijing says Japan has never admitted to committing the Nanking Massacre, nor has it apologized or paid compensation for it. However, the Communist Party has put more Chinese to death than the Japanese ever did. Has the party ever admitted, apologized or paid compensation?
Upon seeing through its true nature, one understands that the Chinese Communist Party cannot be truly anti-Japanese. It can only make a few threats by staging "mass movements" when necessary. But if Beijing overplays nationalism, it will sooner or later shoot itself in the foot.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Francis Huang.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.