A few days ago, President Chen Shui-bian (
Making a cross-strait win-win situation the point of departure for government policy, he should consider China policy from the vantage point of global strategy and separate and amend the agreements of the Economic Development Advisory Conference into their technical, tactical and strategic aspects. Otherwise further declarations and agreements will, in the final analysis, turn out to be nothing but empty decorations.
In reality, Taiwan's economy is not sick to the bone, and some parts of the agreements and suggestions from the cross-strait panel at the advisory conference can be used. The problem lies in how the authorities evaluate what is important and what is not, what is urgent and what is not, and whether they can set a concrete and feasible timetable.
Chen should divide cross-strait economic policies into two parts -- what we can do ourselves, and what has to be achieved through cross-strait negotiations -- and deal with them separately. The former includes issues such as the loosening of the "no haste, be patient" policy, the lifting of restrictions on capital investment in China and reinforced consulting services for Taiwanese companies. Taiwan's government has full control of these issues, and the authorities should therefore set a clear timetable for their implementation as soon as possible.
Chen and his officials understand the crucial issue of negotiating such matters as signing investment guarantee or tax agreements, direct transportation and the opening up of Taiwan to Chinese tourism.
If we don't take the initiative and return to the 1992 consensus and actively create an atmosphere conducive to negotiations, we will be cold-shouldered by China. If that happens, still more political statements and still better agreements coming out of the advisory conference will still turn out to be just so much hot air.
There's actually no harm in clarifying what the cross-strait panel has already proposed and what agreements will be proposed by all members of the conference, by dividing the proposals into their technical, tactical and strategic aspects in order to differentiate between what's important and what isn't and what's urgent and what isn't. Then a timetable should be set that puts the people of Taiwan at ease and that the Chinese Communist Party can understand. This would put cross-strait relations on the tracks of a reliable and stable plan.
The technical aspects could include measures such as Chinese coming to Taiwan as tourists, Chinese scientists and technicians coming to work in Taiwan as well as direct cross-strait telecommunications, mail and money transfers. They could also include measures to match a lifting of unnecessary restrictions on Taiwanese investment in China, permission for financial and insurance companies to invest in China and improvement of the tax and investment environment in order to attract capital back to Taiwan.
Even though some officials frequently complain that companies fleeing to China hollow out the foundations of the nation, statistics show capital flowing back to Taiwan -- through exports from China, with credit going to Taiwan through returning profits and through a favorable trade balance with China, which already contributes approximately half a percentage point to Taiwan's annual economic growth rate.
This may not have been worth mentioning in the past, when the economy was booming, but forecasts show that the economy will grow by only about 1 percent this year. In a situation where the trade surplus with China will remain around last year's US$18 billion, and adding the returning capital mentioned above, cross-strait trade will contribute more than half of Taiwan's economic growth this year, something that must not be underestimated.
Regarding tactics, Chen should first loosen up the "no haste, be patient policy," open up direct cross-strait trade and, when there are no worries about national security, also open up direct communications. China has for a long time shown concern over these three issues, and Taiwan has a lot of room for initiative here. If we can open up tactically, we should be able to gain a positive response from China and thus be able to resolve the cross-strait stand-off.
If, however, we want to guarantee the safety and prosperity of the people of Taiwan, then the "Strategic Alliance of International Corporations" (國際企業聯盟) that Chen advocated in New York would be the best strategic concept. Using the globalization strategy -- attracting foreign capital, combining it with local capital and then moving to China -- could establish Taiwan as the Asia-Pacific center for international corporations and a global logistics center. This would revive the economy.
From another point of view, such a strategy could also closely integrate Taiwanese trade inter-ests with the national interests of other countries. When there is a change in the situation in the Taiwan Strait, it will attract international attention, reducing the possibility of a conflict between the two sides of the strait, and guaranteeing the safety and prosperity of the people of Taiwan.
Kao Koong-lian is a professor at Chung-yuan Christian University. Lee Shin-kuan is an adjunct lecturer at Yuan Ze University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under