The Economic Development Advisory Conference enters its final, consensus-forming stage today, but the two key issues that will determine its success or failure -- relaxing the "no haste, be patient" policy and establishing direct links with China -- are still mired in a debate between national security and economic development concerns.
President Chen Shui-bian (
Everyone is focusing on the conference, but if one looks at the situation from the perspective of post-WTO accession -- expected by the end of the year -- then one gets a very different picture.
Long Yongtu (
After its WTO entry, Taiwan's economy will formally link up with the global economy. Trade relations with China, therefore, will have to be conducted within the WTO framework. Taiwan has already made it clear that it will not invoke any of the organization's exclusionary clauses against China; it will treat China on a par with other countries when it comes to trade relations. There will be no special treatment. Certainly, due to national security concerns arising from cross-strait hostilities, Taiwan may still maintain "effective management" of cross-strait trade. The extent of this management will depend on the actual economic interactions on the ground, as well as Beijing's willingness to reciprocate goodwill.
Within the WTO framework, both Taiwan and China will be independent, internationally accepted customs entities -- with mutually exclusive jurisdictions. This framework can help the two sides get around Beijing's "one China" obstacle, set the sovereignty dispute aside and enter into dialogue on economic issues and build mutual confidence.
However, if Taiwan is to view its trade relations with China -- capital, tariffs, commerce and labor affairs -- from the WTO's international perspective, then it will be necessary to readjust the "no haste, be patient" policy as well as the ban on direct links. Domestically, skipping the globalization versus Sinicization debate can ease the disputes over independence and unification.
As for direct transportation links, the WTO does not require them of members and entry into the trade body does not necessarily entail such links. The issue can be handled in a flexible manner after accession, depending on the actual needs of cross-strait trade, as well as official and non-official cross-strait
interactions.
Everyone attending the EDAC and making decisions on Taiwan's economic direction should realize that trade issues with China will only be one part of Taiwan's globalization process. Taking such a view will enable conference members to avoid making short-sighted, rash decisions.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations