Just as the national Economic Development Advisory Conference was beginning to have an impact on the current political situation, Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) bluntly criticized its consensus on cross-strait economic and trade policy. A short time later, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) lashed out at the environmental impact assessment process while touring a factory.
The blunders that the nation's two top leaders have made with their outspoken criticism have further damaged the government's image. Disturbingly, their comments were not mere slips of the tongue, but rather are related to their attitudes and policy stances, indicating the damage might therefore be more serious than the surface wounds suggest.
When economic alarm bells rang after Chen took office last year, he came up with a policy of giving priority to economic development and postponing social welfare programs. When the economy rapidly worsened, Chen announced that the government would make an all-out effort to salvage it.
With the economic slowdown as a backdrop, it is understandable that the authorities concerned should work hard to solve our economic problems. But if the government -- for the sake of the economy -- sacrifices environmental protection, social welfare and even social justice, people will simply become all the more disillusioned with the DPP government.
The public can understand that the vice president serves as a spokeswoman for specific policies or stances. The public would also be inclined to show respect when the vice president puts forward her views on policy.
But Lu usually fails to act with propriety and thus triggers disputes. She not only hurts others and the government, but also herself. Often, Lu seems to forget that she is the vice president and freely criticizes the government. She has even said that everything she does and says follows her conscience, meaning that no one but she is right. She also said that those in power must have the courage to face history and their consciences. It's almost as though she is in an opposition party and is the only one with a conscience.
Indeed, Lu is perhaps most confused about whether she is in power or a member of the opposition. At the recent 2001 Global Peace Assembly, Lu, in her official status, insisted on playing a leading role in non-governmental activities and thus became the focus of criticism.
Lu has also promoted the formation of the National Union of Taiwanese Women (
In a diverse society during a democratic era, the president should transcend all specific interest groups and protect the rights and interests of all people. The DPP has long promoted social reforms and social justice and should not sacrifice everything for the sake of the economy.
Although she has no substantive power, the vice president can only win the public's respect by choosing her words wisely. More importantly, both the president and vice president must carefully manage their relations with the private sector. Although that sector and the government do not have to be antagonistic toward one another, the nation's top two leaders have to respect majority rights and interests at the grassroots level and should not interfere in NGOs.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a professor in the Department of Sociology at National Taiwan University. Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry