KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) has finally made a goodwill gesture toward President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), saying that he is willing to initiate party-to-party negotiations after the Economic Development Advisory Conference. It has apparently dawned on Lien that Taiwan's economy will only sink ever deeper if opposition parties continue to boycott the ruling party and render it powerless, and that only partisan cooperation can revive the economy. The goodwill has come late, but better late than never.
That Lien should have viewed the conference, Chen's brainchild, with suspicion is understandable. In October last year, no sooner had Lien walked out of a summit with Chen at the Presidential Office -- where they had discussed the economy, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (
The Chen administration's flippant handling of the issue caused Lien to lose faith in the ruling party's credibility and consequently to close the door to partisan negotiations. Lien also rejected Chen's invitation to serve as vice chairman of the conference, though the KMT did not object when the Presidential Office invited Vincent Siew (
Of course, Lien also had his own reasons for expressing his acceptance of the conference shortly before it began.
First, the KMT sees the conference as an important means to revive Taiwan's economy. The key suggestions reached during its panel discussions -- to relax the "no haste, be patient" policy and to establish direct links with China -- are in line with the KMT's official policy and it therefore does not want to be absent from the conference. In fact, it wants to vie for a leading role in the implementation of the consensus reached at the conference, so as to share credit for its results.
The KMT can also use this opportunity to strut its large economic talent pool and show the electorate that it is the party with the real ability to govern. This will certainly be beneficial for the KMT in the year-end elections.
Second, by suggesting political negotiations, Lien has stolen the initiative before the PFP's James Soong (
Finally, the KMT-led opposition alliance wants to maintain a legislative majority after the year-end elections and gain enough power to form a Cabinet. If the economy continues to deteriorate, such an alliance would stand to inherit a pile of economic ruin which would very much be to the detriment of a KMT-led Cabinet. It won't be until the first quarter of next year before the implementation of the conference's conclusions begin to bear fruit. At that time, the opposition alliance can grandly claim all the credit for the economy's recovery.
Regardless of the KMT's motivations, both the Presidential Office and the ruling party should welcome its entry onto the scene because any conclusion reached at the conference will remain hollow without endorsement from the opposition parties, particularly the KMT.
The country stands to benefit from cooperation between the ruling and opposition parties. This will be a victory for all, no matter what selfish motives are behind cooperation.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations