Watch yourself carefully, and think how you could be seen in the eyes of others." This is the lesson I was taught in elementary school in Tokyo.Nowadays, however, that piece of wisdom seems less widely shared in Japan.Regrettably, the same seems to be true in neighboring countries, where Japanese attitudes are criticized stridently.
A harsh debate concerning a new history textbook for junior high schools in Japan has prompted me to think about how the tone of a debate shapes perceptions. 19 years ago, I lived in Seoul as a language student when the first angry protests against Japanese textbooks occurred. It took years to recover from this, but since then Korean-Japan relations have improved significantly, despite the fact that some politicians sometimes talk about Japan's past in a thoughtless way. As the result of numerous primeministerial apologies for Japan's former colonization and aggression in Asia, expanded economic and grassroots exchanges are today a normal part of relations between Japan and its neighbors.
Indeed, during his visit to Japan in 1998, President Kim Dae-jung openly boosted reconciliation between our two countries. The upcoming World Cup Soccer Tournament in 2002, which Japan and South Korea will jointly host, should have been the crowning symbol of these friendly relations, in sharp contrast to a century ago, when Japanese imperialism was on the march. Instead, the dispute over a new Japanese history textbook has claimed centerstage. Even though it passed official examinations by Japan's government, which insisted on numerous revisions, the textbook in question does clearly intend to glorify Japan's history. So it is not unreasonable for Koreans and Chinese to object to its use, particularly as they see it as aimed at justifying Japan's wars against them.
ILLUSTRAION: YU SHA
While I disagree with the textbook's thrust, I don't want to over estimate its importance. It is only one among eight possible textbooks for junior high schools. More importantly, no public school district adopted the textbook for use by its students, mostly because local education committees rejected its message. That result should demonstrate to everyone that an unhealthy nationalism is not supported by a majority in Japan.
So, while I sympathize with our neighbors and their concerns, I am uneasy about foreign governments demanding -- directly -- that Japan modify specific details in its textbooks. It is Japan's responsibility to control the content of school textbooks. Japan must be more scrupulous in writing textbooks, of course, but what country anywhere would easily bow to outside pressure where the education of its children is concerned? It is puzzling that numerous planned exchanges between Japanese and Korean grassroots organizations were canceled by the Korean side because of this dispute. Perhaps these cancellations were seen as a type of sanction on Japan, but such attitudes tend to be seen as "overly emotional" in Japanese eyes, and may provoke a resurgence among some Japanese of the very nationalism the Koreans loathe.
If the Korean people had, instead, chosen to continue the exchanges and mentioned their objections to the textbooks in friendly and frank discussions, Japan's people would have understood and respected the Koreans more. I hope the Koreans will come to believe in our good faith a little more when they see how few school districts adopt the textbook to which they object. That good faith was tested again in the eyes of Koreans and Chinese by the visit of Prime Minister Junichero Koizumi to the Yasukuni Shrine. Koizumi argues that the purpose of his visit was merely to mourn for the Japanese soldiers who died during WWII.
But visits to Yasukuni, like history textbooks, have a complex history, dating back to 1985 when then prime minister Nakasone made an "official visit" to Yasukuni, ignoring strident domestic opposition. He was forced not to repeat the visit because of severe Chinese protests. It is true that "Class A" war criminals from WWII are enshrined in Yasukuni alongside other rank and file soldiers, and Yasukuni is indeed seen as a symbol of Japan's past militarism by Asian countries. So Koizumi can hardly expect silent understanding about his visit.
Yet the manner in which Japan's neighbors objected stunned many Japanese. China's foreign minister even went so far as to say, on camera to Japanese reporters after his meeting with Japan's foreign minister: "I told her to stop the visiting." In Japanese, this phrase carries a very strong connotation of command, a posture that may further stoke Japanese xenophobia.
Perhaps Koizumi intended, by his visit, to call attention to a perceived Chinese insensitivity to Japanese concerns. China's rapid military buildup of recent years and its obsessions with nuclear missile development are not easily understood by a Japanese public who see their country as contributing mightily in terms of economic assistance to China.
But manipulating symbols to send diplomatic messages rarely works effectively, for symbols are imprecise and their meanings are easily distorted.
Koizumi's visit may, indeed, only further stimulate China's military buildup. In this, sadly, we can begin to glimpse a return to the sad downward spiral among neighbors that once gripped this region. His visit to Yasukuni over, Koizumi must do all that he can to prevent that unfortunate spiral from repeating itself.
Yoshibumi Wakamiya is a guest scholar of The Brookings Institution. He is senior political writer at Asahi Shimbun and the author of The Postwar Conservative View Of Asia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under