Taiwan's political parties are divided into two major groups -- the so-called "pan-blue camp," which consists of the KMT, the People First Party and the New Party, and the "pan-green camp" which is made up of the ruling DPP and the newly established Taiwan Solidarity Union.
This situation illustrates how the boundaries between political parties have gradually become blurred. Such a division, however, is undoubtedly a myth that took shape as each party began to try to expand its base of support.
Although the parties within each camp claim to be both cooperating and competing with each other in the run up to the year-end elections, a significant barrier to any party securing victory actually lies in the interactions between parties in the same camp. Whether or not a party can efficiently maximize its support is determined by its degree of collaboration with its allies.
Competition can improve party efficiency and cooperation can reduce campaign costs. Competition without cooperation may cause an increase in campaign costs; cooperation without competition may cause a reduction of efficiency. Each party's willingness to look for space to cooperate while competing is actually therefore driven by the possible benefits the party can yield from such a move.
Of course, party-to-party cooperation is not unconditional, as parties are willing to work with one another only when cooperation has something to offer. To gain from cooperation, the establishment of an infrastructure for such cooperation is indispensable.
However, looking at the cooperative systems and rules of the two alliances, dialogue and negotiation mechanisms only exist between high-level party leaders. Their significance is merely symbolic. No concrete approaches have been proposed for real party-to-party cooperation.
The problem lies in each party's future development. Although the parties are now confronting the difficulty of choosing between cooperation and competition, they will eventually make the appropriate choice. That choice is to spend one-tenth of their effort on antagonism, two-tenths on cooperation and seven-tenths on self-development.
The establishment of cooperative systems and rules may further promote party-to-party cooperation and reduce campaign costs. But each party has to strive in the elections even harder in the light of future party development, as other allies' attitudes have to be taken into account. Regardless of the camp, each party will basically put its self-development as its first priority.
Wang Chi-ming is a doctoral student in the department of political science at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations