Proportional to its population more people were killed and tortured for their beliefs during the 1970s and 1980s in Guatemala than any other country in the world. Over the last decade it had seemed to many that the situation was slowly, but cumulatively improving. But the last 12 months or so it has started in some respects to worsen again. While the country still remains democratic if imperfectly so, while some judges are slowly gaining a measure of independence and confidence (but a few live in fear of their lives), while the army -- the main perpetuator of human rights abuses -- has diminished, and while the press, always prepared to criticize the government and the political order, becomes even stronger and more independent, it is clear that all is not well in Guatemala.
Some would put it stronger than that and say that powerful elements in the army are re-engaging their old habits of intimidating and often killing their habitual critics. Some, indeed, would go so far to say that the rise in human rights abuse could be correlated with the winding down of the Clinton Administration and the changing of the guard in Washington -- as when Ronald Reagan's new Administration came into office in 1981 it was the cue for human rights abuses in Guatemala to take off toward the stratosphere.
Reagan made it abundantly clear he was far more concerned with the advance of communism than he was with reining in the Guatemalan army. The US ambassador to Guatemala, David Chaplin, regularly prompted his Washington superiors as to what was going on in the country, but it fell on deaf ears. In February 1984, only a day after he had sent one of his revealing cables to Washington, he was taken aback to hear that the Assistant Secretary of State for human rights, Elliott Abrams, had signed off on a secret report to Congress in which he had argued that human rights were improving in Guatemala and that Congress should no longer be inhibited about the resumption of US security assistance. No wonder that when the new president of Guatemala, General Efrain Rios Montt, visited Washington he could dare to say in his public speech, "We have no scorched earth in Guatemala, only scorched communists."
Thus today it rather looks as if the new nominations to high office of Reagan's Central American appointees, including Elliott Abrams and John Negroponte, are sending a silent signal, intentional or not, to the Guatemalan old guard that Washington will look the other way.
In a new report Amnesty International says, "human rights organizations and advocates are increasingly being targeted ... The prevailing impunity gives a clear signal that perpetrators can literally continue to get away with murder. Amnesty is concerned that the Guatemalan government is in fact encouraging attacks through ill-considered public statements that have periodically accused human rights defenders and other activists of seeking to destabilize the country."
It's just over 20 years since Amnesty issued one of its most outspoken reports in which it accused the government of running " a deliberate and longstanding programme" of torture and murder. It was this report that drew the world's attention for the first time to the particular horror of Guatemala. The massacres and murder were not the work of independent right-wing death squads as had been maintained but, as Amnesty correctly said, of special units of the army itself, receiving their orders directly from the president's office. All through the Reagan years this was denied, or at least minimized. When George Bush senior took over he did move to use his authority to wind down the killings, although it seems from recent evidence that clandestine American military support did continue. Only under the administration of Bill Clinton was the UN encouraged to investigate past abuses and came up with conclusions that read like a reprint of the Amnesty report of 1981. In 1999 on a visit to Guatemala City Clinton made a public mea culpa, saying, "For the United States it is important that I state clearly that [American] support for military forces and intelligence units which engaged in violence and wide-spread repression was wrong." And the Washington Post editorialized: "We Americans need our own truth commission."
It is only five weeks ago that President Alfonso Portillo of Guatemala met President George W. Bush. But was anything made clear about America's intolerance for winding the clock back? Was anything said to disillusion the Guatemalans that the appointments of Negroponte and Abrams don't mean that this Administration will tolerate what the highly regarded (in Republican circles) Reagan administration did. Judging from the record, if anything on these lines was said you would have needed sophisticated listening equipment to have heard it. This is not to say that Bush is about to re-engage in Central America in a reprise of the advocacy of Reagan that communism had to be stopped however it were done. The stakes are just not that high today. But, without a doubt, under Bush there is a profound sense of benign neglect. Left to its own devices, without pressure from outside, Guatemala looks to be in danger of sliding back into its murderous old habits.
Jonathan Power is a freelance columnist based in London.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry