At last, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), an umbrella group representing the recording industry in Taiwan, and 14 Chengkung University (
The question fundamental to this case is whether the students had indeed broken any law. The defense attorney hired by Chengkung University (
Such comment indicates that the students implicated may have agreed to concede their mistakes to avoid possible legal punishment for their action, but they and the general public, as a matter of fact, remain hazy about the copyright questions involved. Therefore, Taiwan's government must take the necessary steps to clarify the relevant legal gray areas, and the Ministry of Education must keep up its promise to the IFPI by strengthening on-campus education on intellectual property rights.
At the very least, it is comforting to know the students implicated are now willing to concede their wrongs, a sign indicative of an ability to engage in self-scrutiny in the manner of mature and reasonable adults. It is a major step in the right direction. When the controversy first broke out, students, and not just the 14 implicated, were so outraged they were totally unwilling to acknowledge any wrongdoing.
Understandably, the raid of student dorm rooms by the local prosecutor's office -- without proper consent or search warrants -- stoked their anger. However, a large part of their anger had to do with an inability to conduct mature and rational self-scrutiny, as well as some very faulty logic and values. Some of their rationales included "everyone is doing it [ie, the unauthorized downloading]," "why not go after the organized pirates," and "the prosecutor's office made mistakes, too [ie, referring to the raid]," and so on. In other words, their first instinct was to look for scapegoats and point the finger at others, when nothing justifies or excuses unauthorized taking from others. It is at least a moral wrong, if not a legal wrong.
But, on further reflection, maybe the students should not be blamed for such immature and confused logic. After all, just look at the rest of the members of Taiwan's society, who are supposedly mature adults and, in particular, its politicians and lawmakers.
For example, the opposition alliance appears to think Lee Teng-hui (
Unless the adults and politicians of Taiwan grow up first, the youngsters of Taiwan will continue to lack role models of maturity and rationality.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with