Time to learn from the past
Taiwan's latest uncoordinated response to the damage caused by Typhoon Toraji demonstrates the lack of an adequate hazard relief, emergency planning and integrated response system. It appears that little has been learned from the mistakes made in the aftermath of the 921 earthquake.
Many other countries long ago adopted the Incident Command System to coordinate the response efforts of the numerous government, private sector and non-profit organizations that respond to major emergencies or disasters. The command system was first developed in 1972 as an emergency management mechanism and resource allocation process to coordinate federal, state and local resources needed to battle wildfires after a fire destroyed 250,000 hectares across seven counties in Southern California. In the early 1980s the US Federal Emergency Management Agency adopted the system as a model for handling all emergencies in the US.
The ICS structure is composed of several major components to ensure quick and effective resource commitment and to minimize disruption to the normal operating procedures of responding organizations. While this system has a number of major concepts, the most critical and that which Taiwan appears to lack, is unified command.
Unified command allows all agencies with responsibility for the incident -- either geographic or functional -- to manage an incident by establishing a common set of incident objectives and strategies. This does not mean losing or giving up individual agency authority, responsibility or accountability. This concept means that all involved agencies contribute to the command process by determining overall objectives, planning jointly, and maximizing the use of all assigned resources.
While a coordinated res-ponse is important, disaster mitigation and planning are even more critical. Again several countries have adopted various forms of the 13-step Integrated Emergency Management System developed by the US federal agency in 1983. The management system was developed to improve the ability to respond to major emergencies and disasters with the goal of planning, developing and maintaining credibility by integrating activities along functional lines at all levels of government and -- to the fullest extent possible -- across all hazards.
How many more disasters will Taiwan have to weather before the government decides to take proactive steps to ensure that the effects of disasters are reduced by mitigation and recovery times are improved by pre-planning and coordinated response efforts?
Moray J. Taylor-Smith
Taipei
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations