While Typhoon Toraji was bringing disaster to Taiwan, it looked as though the authorities had a poor grasp of the situation. Apart from using telephones to communicate with the outside world, central and local disaster prevention centers actually had to rely on satellite relayed TV broadcasts to keep abreast of the situation. Taiwan is a large exporter of computers and communications equipment, and if we cannot take advantage of our own strengths -- computer and communications equipment -- then knowledge of, control of, and reaction to disasters will always be delayed.
The 921 earthquake of 1999 is a glaring example: the real physical extent of the disaster area only became known one to two days after the quake. As a result, the most critical rescue period was lost, resulting in a greater loss of human life than would otherwise have been the case.
Typhoons and earthquakes are the two main reasons for natural disasters in Taiwan. They lead to landslides, collapses and mudslides in the upper reaches of rivers and streams, while in their middle and lower reaches, the combined effect of these phenomena is to create mountain torrents and flooding.
Due to changes in the topographical and hydrological environment and an increasing non-water-permeable surface area run-off is concentrated. This contributes to water disasters in metropolitan areas. The flooding that Typhoon Trami brought to Kaohsiung is an obvious example. Low atmospheric pressure and strongly gusting typhoon winds create freak waves that endanger coastal areas. If a typhoon and an earthquake struck at the same time, the results would be even worse. In the midst of all this, the authorities must propose concrete measures and carry out disaster prevention work. We have the Disaster Prevention and Rescue Law, but the government's understanding of and resolve to implement this law must be improved.
In reality, there is no way to avoid these disasters. It is the government's duty, however, to warn the populations of potential disaster areas, including potential mudslide danger areas, dangerous mountain slope areas, and areas where there is a danger of flooding. It is also its duty to continuously make public announcements prior to the typhoon season each year, to create danger awareness in the local population.
Next, disaster prevention preparations should be checked for compliance with the Disaster Prevention and Rescue Law, and specialized state and civil organizations should be mobilized to prepare for exercises.
Once disaster strikes, it will be possible to carry out rescue efforts and other responses using the most advanced equipment in the shortest time possible.
It is regrettable that the government has not implemented most of the Disaster Prevention and Rescue Law. Where are the safe areas for township governments in case of a mud slide or a flood, for example?
Which roads are safe to use to escape disaster-struck areas? What about assistance for the elderly, women and children, the handicapped? Public announcements about the locations of temporary parking lots and other safe areas during floods? Information regarding safe water levels in rivers and pump station operations? All of the above are non-existent. My suggestion is that supervisory systems be installed at places where disaster easily strikes, such as rivers and drainage channels, and that continuous access be provided via the Internet, geographical information systems or other channels to allow people to evaluate the situation and prepare for disaster prevention.
Finally, the attitude in post-disaster restoration work and reduction of the impact of disasters should be based on adapting to nature. Areas where the earth's crust is weak, areas prone to flooding and water conservancy areas, for example, should not be used for development. Otherwise, inappropriate development will lead to the use of dikes and embankments to fight the water head-on, leading people to believe, wrongly, that disasters cannot occur, lowering their crisis awareness. Of course, we shouldn't only stress so-called ecological construction methods in post-disaster restoration work. By only implementing "greenification" we not only misunderstand the meaning of ecological construction methods, but we may even destroy the natural ecological balance and underestimate the resilience of nature itself.
All in all, the problem of potential water disasters often arises from inappropriate land use, and its solution lies in a return to land management.
For example, if water resource problems created by strong mountainside development in the upper reaches of a river (while filling of the river valley at the middle and lower reaches of the river continues) and continued development of river beds are only dealt with by the continuous increase of embankment heights, and the expanded construction of water pump stations, the risk of embankment breaches becomes very high as do the follow-up maintenance costs, interfering with natural principles as well as violating economic efficiency principles.
Because of this, sound water circulation -- letting rainwater return to the earth -- should be another approach. Letting rainwater accumulate and filter down to become underground rivers and slowly flow out again, replenishing the basic river flow, maintaining the water volumes needed for the river's ecological system. Regrettably, the non-water-permeable area of metropolitan roads is constantly increasing.
The notion of flooding as a disaster is a notion centered on people. Each time there is rainfall, natural resources are replenished, and it is only the appropriate periodic flooding of rivers that moves nutritious resources down to the middle and lower reaches of the river. Land develops thanks to rainwater irrigation.
We should not reject the gift of rain by straightening rivers, constructing steep water drainage systems and greatly expanding the use of water pumps and restrict the chances for change caused by rainfall coming into contact with the soil by constructing embankments along rivers. These are all ways of harnessing water that are in violation of nature.
Chen Szu-hsien is chairman of the Taiwan Association of Hydraulic Engineers.
Translated by Perry Svensson.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s