The opposition alliance has relentlessly criticized A-Bian's (阿扁) handling of the economy over the past year, and it blames the nation's woes on his refusal to lift restrictions on cross-strait trade and investment. Many opposition politicians believe that direct links will miraculously solve all of Taiwan's economic problems, and if the country has to knuckle under to Beijing on the "one China" issue to make this happen, so be it. They are not the only ones who feel this way; there is growing public support for at least giving it a try. This puts A-Bian in a rather tricky spot.
For the easing of restrictions on this side of the strait to have any noticeable effect, Beijing has to reciprocate. Of course, before that happens A-Bian is going to have to kowtow before the altar of "one China." Many DPP supporters, however, are pro-independence, so if A-bien accepts "one China," even the watered-down 1992 version, he may end up facing a revolt in his own ranks. Given that the year-end elections are going to be a tight race, the DPP cannot really afford to alienate any of its hardcore supporters. Furthermore, if A-Bian goes ahead, there is no guarantee his gamble will pay off in terms of an economic upturn before the elections. If this turns out to be the case, he will have alienated many of his own supporters for nothing.
It appears, however, that A-bian has found a way out of this dilemma. First, he knows that eventually he will have to lift restrictions on cross-strait trade and investment, which means making certain concessions on "one China." But, at the same time, he must avoid looking like a traitor to his party. Second, he needs to ensure that if Beijing rebuffs him, or if the expected economic benefits do not materialize, he will not have to shoulder the blame alone. To accomplish the former, he will have to make it appear as if he was forced to recognize "one China," while the latter requires that he involve prominent business figures and opposition politicians in the decision-making process. This is where the Eco-nomic Development Advisory Conference comes in.
A-bien has promised to comply with whatever decisions the conference makes, but he already knows what those recommendations will be. In essence, he has committed himself to recognizing the 1992 consensus on "one China," opening up direct links and lifting restrictions on investment. By "humbly" pledging compliance with the group's decisions in advance, however, he has cleverly shifted responsibility for these drastic changes on to the conference. This may not be enough to appease the hardcore independence activists in the DPP, but it will be enough to mute much of the criticism from his supporters when he eventually accepts some version of "one China."
Furthermore, by inviting multi-party participation in the conference, A-Bian has forced the opposition parties to put up or shut up. Before the formation of the conference, it looked as if issues surrounding cross-strait relations, trade and investment would play a decisive role in the upcoming elections. Now, however, A-Bian has brilliantly stolen the opposition's thunder. Their participation in drawing up the conference's recommendations means that they will no longer be able to attack the president for his stance on cross-strait relations and the economy, and if the group's advice fails to halt the economic slowdown, they will also share the blame.
Furthermore, since the government's future cross-strait and economic policies will be based on this supra-party consensus, the focus in the elections will likely swing back to domestic issues like "black gold" politics and the environment. The DPP has a clear advantage over the opposition in these areas, so a focus on domestic issues should help the DPP in the elections.
Colin Green is a visiting researcher at the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry