AMONG THE ANCIENT fears of mariners is to be washed ashore on a foreign land with no hope of return to their native land or being held captive as pawns in a power struggle over which they have no control. Both of these ancient fears have become true for Captain Evangelos Lazaridis and Chief Engineer Vasileios Sardis of the Greek cargo ship the M/V Amorgos. Over six months ago their vessel ran aground on the south coast of Taiwan. As the ship broke up it dumped thousands of tonnes of oil into the ocean, creating a highly publicized environmental disaster. The cleanup of the spill has been completed, no criminal charges have ever been filed against them but they remain prisoners in Taiwan, apparently indefinitely. They are pawns being used by Taiwan's Environmental Protection Agency in an attempt to extract concessions out of the vessel's insurer. Such use of individuals as bargaining chips is contemptible. The Taiwanese government must take immediate steps to free these crewmen.
In a very real sense these crew members are being held hostage for a ransom. Taiwan's EPA has placed a detention order on them which keeps the crewmen from leaving Taiwan, thus they are hostages. The "ransom demand" made by the EPA is for the ship's insurance carrier to sign certain assurances regarding its liability for damages resulting from the oil spill. The EPA claims it has the legal authority under provisions of the Ocean Pollution Control Act to keep the two crew members prisoners here because the ship's insurer refuses to make the assurances demanded by the EPA. The Taiwan Association for Human Rights has strongly condemned the indefinite detention of the two crew members.
This holding of the two prisoners, done entirely outside any judicial channels, is condemnable for a number of obvious reasons. First it is a direct violation of Taiwan's Constitution. Article 8 of the Taiwanese Constitution clearly states, as would be expected, that no person shall be detained except by a judicial organ in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law. The EPA is an administrative body, not a judicial body. Its indefinite detentions of the crew members without any judicial review is analogous to a type of martial law where people are imprisoned at the Executive's whim and favor.
To use two metaphors from British legal history it is a cross between the Star Chamber and the Tower of London.
International human rights law takes a dim view of Star Chamber-like proceedings too. Under international law all persons detained have a right to a judicial review of their detention within a reasonable time. The key phrase is "judicial review."
As Attorney Ken Chiu (
Holding the two crew members prisoner does little to ensure that a third party, the maritime insurance carrier, will make the assurances the EPA is demanding. There are far better ways of attempting to ensure that the insurance company accepts responsibility. The EPA is simply using the crew members as pawns because it is easier than doing the legal work that would be involved in some alternative solution.
Holding the two crew members prisoner does one thing however; it creates the image abroad that Taiwan is an island of savages where taking of hostages is still an acceptable way to solve money disputes. Taiwan is always complaining about its poor, limited international image but then will turn around and do something like this that marks Taiwan as a kind of little renegade island with nothing even close to a rule of law.
The whole incident calls into question the government's commitment to human rights and human rights diplomacy. It is hypocrisy to claim that human rights and human rights diplomacy is a high priority and then allow foreign crew members to be held as pawns in a money squabble between the EPA and some maritime insurance company.
Brian Kennedy is an attorney who writes and teaches on criminal justice and human rights issues.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and