The joint petition filed to the president recently by 14 national policy advisors, including myself, has prompted different interpretations, attesting to the Taiwanese people's deep concern about the cross-strait relations issue, which therefore deserves rational discussion. But it is necessary to clarify some of the viewpoints.
Some stated that the Economic Development Advisory Conference (
The petition was presented for reference before the work of the conference gets underway because the conference had a discussion group on cross-strait economic and trade issues.
Some suspected that the petition might trigger disputes over the unification-independence issue.
After a closer look at the petition, they will know that the idea of "one China under the ROC Constitution's framework" serves only as a basis for understanding and a common language needed by the two sides across the Taiwan Strait to reopen their dialogues.
In other words, the idea is a starting point for breaking the cross-strait deadlock without touching the sensitive issue of the two sides' status.
Still others questioned that the petition is aimed at establishing the three direct links (
In reality, the "one China" principle mentioned in the petition belongs to the abstract and "metaphysical" level, and therefore does no harm to Taiwan's stance and dignity.
Whether or not the three links should be established and "no haste, be patient" policy be relaxed are substantive matters. Since this part is related to Taiwan's economic interests, members of the Economic Development Advisory Conference should carefully deal with it.
Our petition is not intended to press the government.
Instead, we believe that we should stay firm on the "Taiwan first" perspective.
This petition, which promoted the one China framework under the Constitution, was motivated by the current bleak economic prospects and the cross-strait deadlock. We are worried that as this situation drags on, it may become much more difficult to salvage Taiwan's worsening economy. Therefore, we simply tried to seek solutions and provided suggestions to the government for reference. No ulterior motives were involved.
Hsu Wun-pin is a national policy advisor to the president.
Translated by Jackie Lin
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry