As the Presidential Office's Economic Development Advisory Conference gets underway, many of Taiwan's unresolved political and economic problems are being brought up for debate. The "one China" issue, cited as a factor that affects cross-strait economic and trade relations, is also threatening to become a subject of political wrangling.
Having fiddled with the concept of a confederation for a while, the KMT initially planned to propose the incorporation of the idea into the party's charter at its 16th national congress this Sunday, in order to distinguish Chairman Lien Chan (
The idea has also started a fierce debate within the KMT. The pro-unification elements in the party are suspicious of the idea, which they view as a maneuver for independence first and then unification. The pro-localization factions are uncomfortable with what they see as "pre-determined unification." Lien has come under fire from all sides over the proposal and so the KMT finally decided to shelve the idea of making confederation part of its party platform.
Last Friday a group of 14 national policy advisors to the president, including Hsu Wun-pin (許文彬) and Chuang Po-lin (莊柏林), sent a joint letter to Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) suggesting that "one China according to the ROC Constitution" be used as a foundation for defining cross-strait relations. They suggested that Chen use that concept to counter Beijing's "one China" and to facilitate the resumption of cross-strait dialogue. The advisors based their suggestion on Chen's statement that "one China" is written in the ROC Constitution and, therefore, is not a problem for the Taiwan government. This has led to suspicions that the advisors' letter was actually a trial balloon floated by the Presidential Office. The letter has provoked a lot of controversy in Taipei's political circles and even within the Presidential Office.
Now another group of 30 or more national policy advisors has sent a letter to Chen opposing "one China according to the ROC Constitution" idea. This group says "one China" is a trap set by Beijing and condemned Hsu and Chuang for organizing their letter drive immediately after returning from a visit to China.
"One China" is a major point of disagreement not only between the two sides of the Strait, but also between and within Taiwan's political parties. The KMT and People First Party advocate "one China, with each side making its own interpretation." The new political party that is under formation -- the Taiwan Solidarity Union -- advocates "special state-to-state relations." The DPP has a pro-independence party charter, but within the party there are differences between the pro-independence factions and the "march west" factions. The two letters highlight the disparity among presidential advisors. A consensus on "one China" is unlikely to be agreed upon any time soon.
Taiwan's economic problems are certainly linked to the positioning of cross-strait relations, but it is impractical to hope that the Economic Development Advisory Conference will resolve all of Taiwan's political and economic issues. Starting a new round of "one China" debate in the middle of the conference will only shift the focus away from economic issues and onto fruitless political disputes. The dispute may even derail the conference -- which would have a far-reaching and negative impact on Taiwan's development. This is not what the people of Taiwan expect.
So, a word of advice to Taiwan's political and economic leaders: Shelve the China issue and focus on economics.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry