The recent announcement by Liu Mingkang (
Two years ago newly created asset management companies removed nearly 20 percent of "dead capital" from the balance sheets of the four large, state-owned banks with the objective of putting those banks on a sound commercial footing. The problem is that those banks continue to lend primarily to lackluster state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and there is no incentive to let the big banks fail or to allow privatization.
The Chinese Communist Party is the de facto owner of the bulk of business assets. Party officials therefore have the opportunity to oversee all important financial transactions and to benefit from "state" ownership at the expense of taxpayers and the private sector. Rampant corruption is the result.
To end corruption, China needs to depoliticize capital markets by putting state assets up for sale, decontrolling interest rates, removing capital controls and protecting private property rights. As long as the state dominates the banking system and stock exchanges, domestic capital markets will fail to provide the liquidity needed for future growth and will continue to waste capital.
Allowing the sale of shares in SOEs would work only if private owners could gain full control of business assets. Halfway measures that leave the party as the chief stakeholder and the boss won't solve the liquidity or insolvency problems. Individuals must be allowed to specialize freely in ownership and risk-taking if capital is to be put to its highest-valued uses.
During the past decade or more, foreign-funded enterprises and private enterprises have been the driving force in China's economy. State enterprises as a whole continue to stagnate. So-called profits often disappear under close scrutiny, as happened last year when auditors found that many SOEs had falsified their books to meet official targets.
China's accession to the WTO, expected later this year or early next year, will pave the way for financial market liberalization. State-owned banks will be under increasing pressure to compete successfully or fail. The only way they can compete is by "jumping into the sea of private enter-prise." And that means allowing specialization and risk diversification according to market
criteria and on the basis of private ownership.
According to Tao Liping, a senior economist with the depart-ment of economic forecasting at the State Information Center, "Twisted signals for capital demand and supply due to a fixed interest rate system set by the government have acted as a ball and chain on financial reform in China." Banks must be free to pay market rates on their deposits and charge market rates on their loans, if capital is to be efficiently allocated. The governor of the central bank, Dai Xianlong (
The forward motion of globalization will inevitably clash with the inertia of the Communist Party. How far and fast the party bends under the momentum of the WTO will determine how soon economic liberalization will bring about political change.
Those who are looking for rapid financial liberalization in China should be patient: experience has taught that market institutions -- the rule of law, private property, freedom of contract -- emerge only gradually, especially when confronted with a political force as strong as the Communist Party. Yet the dismal condition of China's banks, enterprises and pension funds makes reform essential.
The problem is that real reform requires exactly what the party cannot sanction if it is to survive -- namely, the full-fledged privatization of state assets, including the social security system. Privatization would mean the death of the last vestige of the centrally planned economy -- investment planning. It would mean the end of party influence in all enterprises and the collapse of work units in urban areas. Without the pillar of state ownership, the party would have nothing left on which to rest its moral authority. It would no longer be the guardian of the "people's property." The people themselves would rule.
In his speech celebrating the party's 80th anniversary, President Jiang Zemin (
James A. Dorn is a China specialist at the Cato Institute in Washington.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.