Over the past year or so, we have seen more political and social strife than during any election campaign. While policy debates have been reduced to empty sloganeering, the emotional level in politics is escalating. This is especially true in the debate on globalization and localization.
Some equate localization with ethnic grudges, while others believe that Taiwan should embrace globalization and bring its localization work to a close.
Taiwan has long been globalized at both political and economic levels. It is a major exporter of capital, ranking 16th in the world in terms of the value of direct overseas investments. Import and export trade take up a stable 40 percent or more of GDP.
To maintain its competitiveness, Taiwan should continue with the process of globalization, but globalization does not mean sinicization or embracing China on every front.
Those calling for the downplaying of Taiwan's sovereignty -- or even for the acceptance of "one country, two systems" -- are turning a blind eye to Taiwan's relations with other economies, as well as its strategic industrial position. In fact, the extensive sinicization of Taiwan's economy is downright alarming. Taiwan's investments in China are equivalent to 2.4 percent of its annual GDP. In comparison, Japan has invested only 0.04 percent of its GDP in China and the US 0.03 percent.
Taiwan's economic growth is rooted in its near-peripheral niche of efficient manufacturing and utilization of technologies and capabilities from abroad.
In the process of globalization, therefore, Taiwan should not blindly move closer to the fringes, or worse, take the fringes as its center. Instead, it should utilize its current strategic position and capabilities, maintain its relationships with the (world's business) centers and improve its R&D capabilities and its capacity for innovation, to achieve genuine globalization.
Localization is not an obstacle to globalization, nor is globalization bringing the localization work or even nationhood to an end. Globalization brings an equal number of negative and positive results. When multinationals are able to freely select and reshuffle the elements of the manufacturing process, they give rise to a migrant, exploitative economic model.
Multinationals rely on political and economic order, which is maintained by sovereign states. They also single-mindedly de-mand as corporate "indivi-duals," that states provide them with better public assets, such as infrastructure, human resources and so on. However, they also try to exclude themselves from the responsibilities of citizens of a sovereign state. Through various tax incentives, they enjoy the lowest tax burdens. The result is a draining of national tax bases, a widening gap between rich and poor, high unemployment and high GDP growth coupled with falling wage levels.
It is because globalization deprives states of the ability to regulate multinationals that there is an increasing need for states to maintain a fair and equitable distribution of resources in society.
On the cultural level, globalization has a double impact. Monocultural trends have made globalization almost equivalent to Americanization or "McDonaldization," which can kill cultural diversity and creativity.
However, cultural globalization brings about the re-emergence and enrichment of local cultures that have been affected by post-colonial cultural hegemony. Good examples are Japanese singer Namie Amuro, who was born and brought up in Okinawa, and Taiwanese pop diva Chang Hui-mei (張惠妹), who hails from an Aboriginal village in Taitung. Their cultural backgrounds have infused new, creative possibilities into increasingly monocultural mainstream pop music.
Continuing globalization will make Taiwan's cultural predicament even more difficult. Tai-wan's historical development has not been conducive to localization. Now, before localization can firmly take root, Taiwan is facing the impact of multi-national cultural commodities.
To equate localization with ethnic hostility, or believe that former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Lin Cho-shui is a DPP legislator.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under