The National Taiwan Museum (國立台灣博物館) has recently once again exhibited the so-called treasure of the city -- the Yellow Tiger Flag of Democratic Taiwan (台灣民主國黃虎旗) -- and other relics from recent Taiwan history, something that will surely rekindle discussions about the status and function of the museum. In its heyday it was popular, but times have changed. With the establishment of many modern museums, this 100-year-old museum, the oldest in Taiwan, will be hard put not to become a relic itself unless it clarifies its function and status.
When the National Museum of History (
How does one distinguish between natural history and the history of civilization ? This is an issue crucial for the development and future existence of the National Taiwan Museum.
The earliest incarnation of the museum, the "Affiliated Museum of the Business Property Bureau of the Civil Affairs Department under the Office of the Taiwan Governor" (台灣總監府民政部殖產局附屬博物館), was established in 1908. It was located where the Po-ai Building is today, on Po-ai Road behind the Presidential Office. With departments of zoology, botany, minerals and history, it already resembled a natural history museum.
Then, in 1915, it moved to its present location inside the 228 Park and its name was changed to "Affiliated Museum of the Taiwan Governor's Office -- The Kodama-Goto Memorial Hall' (台灣總督府附屬博物館 兒玉後騰紀念館).
In 1917, many of the industry-related specimens stored there were moved to another location [the Commodity Exhibition Hall of the Governor's Office (總督商品陳列館)], the first time any of the museum's specimens had been removed and defining its status as an orthodox natural history museum. In 2000, the Council for Cultural Affairs (行政院文化建設委員會) and the Ministry of Education agreed to confirm the National Taiwan Museum as a museum of natural history.
However, since the museum is concerned with zoology, botany, earth sciences, anthropology and education, it is similar to the National Museum of Natural Sciences (
Even though the National Taiwan Museum has been in operation for the better part of a century, it has never been able to incorporate the words "natural history" into its name, ie to have a name that reflects its functions.
During the Japanese occupation, one aim of the colonial regime was to control public opinion and to treat the culture of Taiwan as an alien culture, leading to the museum's anthropological focus on aboriginal culture (including Taiwan, southern China and Southeast Asia) and the collection and study of the Han culture in Taiwan, instead of on archeological and biological anthropology generally, which is the usual focus of natural history museums. This is the basis for the chaos at the museum after Japan's colonial rule ended.
After Taiwan was handed over to the KMT government in China, the scope of the anthropological department was defined as "handling research, collection, study and storage of items related to anthropology and history." Not until 1994 was the word "history" struck from the museum's regulations regarding anthropology. The change, in fact, did not make much difference. The museum has always operated as a general museum.
In particular, activities involving recent historical relics, documents, art, folk customs, religion, festivals and rituals of the Han people have had the effect of crowding out natural history activities, in terms of budget, storage space and educational exhibitions. This has prompted frequent criticism that the museum functions are not clear. It has even been suggested that the museum should become "The National Taiwan Aboriginal Museum" (
The current collections of the anthropological department focus mainly on the history of civilization, folk traditions and aboriginal culture. These areas are also the main specialities of the museum's research staff. The museum has taken on the epochal mission of keeping cultural relics and among the aboriginal cultural relics collected are many gifts moved from the Taitung Local Museum (
However, with the forthcoming elevation of the Council for Cultural Affairs (文建會) to the Ministry of Culture and the establishment of new museums, all relics of a cultural or historical importance should be kept in museums specializing in a particular field in order to strengthen the collection, research and educational functions of museums.
Before the museum's administration is transferred to the education ministry, the personnel and collections of its anthropological department should be combined with the planning office of the National Museum of Taiwan History (國立台灣歷史博物館籌備處) under the Council for Cultural Affairs, in order to assist with the establishment of that museum and to solve its collection shortage problem. Since the main contents of the National Taiwan Museum of History will include the history of our forebearers, recent general history and treasures of traditional folk and aboriginal culture, and because collections are a prerequisite to the establishment of a museum, a system should be adopted for the transfer of collections between museums, in order to avoid an overlap in functions leading to a waste of national resources.
After the transfer of the museum to the education ministry, its name could be changed to the `National Life Sciences and Information Museum' (
One, biotechnology and genetic research -- the Academia Sinica is currently promoting an important national plan in this field and results of advanced biotech R&D both at home and abroad could be on permanent exhibition in the museum, to educate the public about leading developments in the biotechnology.
Two, building biology and genetics databases -- biological categorization techniques have already entered the genetic level, and the museum should actively collect biological specimens from Taiwan and neighboring countries. This would allow it to build a complete collection of biological specimens and a genetics database and decide biological relationships and categorization of the specimens according to themap of the human genome. This technique has already been used for a long time in the examination of criminal evidence. Also, to explore the early beginnings of Taiwan's aboriginals, anthropologists in research organizations are already isolating DNA from pre-historic bone remains from Taiwan for comparison with aboriginals in neighboring countries. Sooner or later the same kind of research will have to be extended to cover all biological categories.
Three, biological conservation and habitat protection -- biological diversity planning is an important research topic for all universities and research institutions, and the results from these institutions could be gathered, analyzed and exhibited by the museum.
Four, museum digitalization -- the museum could function as the planning center and base for the digitalization of all museums in Taiwan, using advanced multimedia and information techniques to disseminate knowledge to all parts of the globe through the global reach of the Internet.
Wang Hsiau-yue is associate curator at the National Taiwan Museum.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry