Us President George W. Bush, in an attempt to defuse tension with Beijing after his assertion in late April that America would do "whatever it takes" to help Taiwan defend itself, quickly reaffirmed the "one-China" policy. In comments directed toward Taipei, he pointedly asserted: "I certainly hope Taiwan adheres to the one China policy. And a declaration of independence is not the one China policy." This caveat is critically important to Beijing, which remains suspicious that "independence" is President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) (and perhaps America's) true objective.
Beijing's fears seem unwarranted, at least in the near term. In my own meetings with Taiwan officials and scholars, I met no one who thought a declaration of independence was a viable option for Taiwan. In fact, Chen has specifically stated there will be no declaration of independence as long as the PRC does not attempt to forcibly reunite Taiwan with China. While a referendum on this issue was on the ruling DPP's agenda when it was in opposition, Chen has dropped this idea as one of many (thusfar unrecognized and unanswered) peaceful gestures toward Beijing.
In reality, were a referendum to be held on the issue today, it is expected that fewer than 10 to 15 percent of the populace would vote for an immediate declaration of independence. However, this is probably double or triple the number who would vote for unification with China (now or at anytime in the foreseeable future). The overwhelming majority would prefer to maintain the status quo, primarily because they are concerned that an open declaration of independence would create chaos -- if not outright war -- across the Taiwan Strait; a confrontation that no one, including Washington, wants.
The dilemma for Beijing is that, as each year passes, fewer and fewer people in Taiwan support unification with China, as the old generation of displaced mainlanders fades from the scene and is replaced with a population that sees itself first and foremost as "Taiwanese." They are Chinese-Taiwanese in the same sense that I am an Italian-American. They may take pride in their ethnic roots but they take even greater pride in their Taiwanese identity and in their economic as well as political accomplishments.
Their primary motivation for not seeking formal independence is their very real fear of the consequences.
Beijing understands this, which is why it refuses to relinquish the option of using force and still periodically rattles sabers in Taiwan's direction. But, the more Beijing sticks to its belligerent stance, the less incentive there is for the people of Taiwan to seek a closer association with China. As someone in Taiwan once put it, "if China was really sincere in wanting to embrace Taiwan toward the `motherland,' it would not be threatening it's long lost son with military action if he does not come home now."
People in Taiwan argue that Beijing should treat unification like "a future marriage in the works;" one that requires a "proper engagement period" to establish a new relationship based on mutual trust. For the two sides to unite, China must first also embrace democracy, which implies a very long engagement period.
In the meantime, both sides need to show a bit more flexibility in seeking common ground. Chen has hinted at accepting some type of "one China, each with its own definitions" (一
Until then, the people of Taiwan should take some comfort in the realization that Taiwan is already a fully independent state and is likely to safely and securely remain so ... as long as it doesn't declare itself to be one.
Ralph A. Cossa is president of the Pacific Forum CSIS.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.