The right to strike is a basic human right and serves as a critical indicator of democratic development. Totalitarian rulers do not adhere to such concepts. They regard strikes as rebellions to be suppressed. Taiwan's former regime was no exception. Although those in power roared out the ideological slogan of "labor-capital harmony"
The Labor Union Law (
Many employers, however, including some well-known corporations, cannot even tolerate the existence of these "capon labor unions" (
The Labor Union Law not only restricts the organization of labor unions, but, in Article 26, sets a very high threshold for a legal strike, making one almost impossible. As a matter of fact, strikes were criminal acts in the martial law era, under the "National Mobilization Law" (
Although it has been more than 10 years since martial law was lifted, the Labor Union Law, remains in effect. Ironically, although politics in Taiwan have taken the democratic path, labor rights are still suppressed. Recently, the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA,
Strikes are invariably damaging to employers, as workers seek to pressure their employers into making concessions through collective bargaining. The more unexpected a strike is, the more damage and pressure the employers suffer, improving the workers' chances of success. If the draft revision becomes law, employers will be able to learn workers' strategies and thereby not only minimize the damage from strikes, but also destroy the hard-won solidarity of the workers before a strike even begins. It is not hard to foretell what degree of success a strike could possibly have under such circumstances.
It was precisely because of the disadvantages to workers caused by notice obligations that Germany did not impose such an obligation. It is important to point out that labor movements are very active in Germany, where unions usually have millions of members, and strikes often cause tremendous damage to employ-ers, the economy and the people's livelihood.
What is the CLA's purpose in making the legal requirements for strikes even more stringent than those in the martial law period?
Since martial law was lifted in July 1987, legal strikes have been few and far between. One exceptions was the strike by the employees of the Keelung Bus Co (
There were fewer than 10 legal and illegal strikes combined each year, except for the peak period of 1988. There were, in fact, no strikes at all in 1993, 1994, 1996 and 1999. In 1999 the number of strikes was zero, even though labor-capital disputes surged by 41 percent in comparison with the previous year!
Strikes have been rare because of the harshness of Article 26 of the Labor Union Law. Workers are also afraid that employers may settle the score with them later. Even when strikes are lawful, employers may retaliate afterwards by finding pretexts to fire those who took part in it. Workers know only too well that strikes will do them no good. When a minority of workers still decides to strike, it is usually because they have no other choice. This being so, why does the CLA have to make life difficult for these workers by raising the threshold for lawful strikes?
During the KMT's rule, DPP members criticized the CLA for being a "Council of Employers' Affairs." Now the situation has changed. Last October labor activists, to protest the government's position on the workweek issue, hung a banner reading "Labor Management Bureau, Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive Yuan" (
Huang Jui-ming is an assistant professor of labor relations at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Jackie Lin and Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.