According to recent reports, some local conglomerates have again requested a bailout by means of an interest rate cut because they are unable to meet their interest payments on bank loans. Likewise, the Ministry of Finance (MOF,
I simply cannot understand why the authorities concerned do not accomplish the whole task at one stroke, letting those weak, small industries die a natural death earlier, but instead give them a helping hand. As a result, rumors of bearish business come out every now and then, dealing terrible blows to the market again and again.
Whenever problems in these conglomerates are exposed, investors' doubts and worries about stocks in those industries and even the whole market increase. Such doubts drive down overall stock prices, and can even cause the size of the financial markets to shrink.
Facing information which is not necessarily correct, investors are unable to correctly identify problematic industries, so they have no choice but to treat them equally and predict lower indexes for all stocks. The situation is like when elementary school teachers have trouble telling who is making a noise and disrupting the class: they may have to punish all the students by making them all stand in the corner.
Due to the existence of problematic industries, companies that are performing well are increasingly suspected of facing operational crises as well. Such a phenomenon is called the adverse selection effect. The key to solving the above problems is to establish an environment where information flows freely. A well-known idiom can serve as its footnote -- honesty is the best policy.
It is really hard to believe that investors, after going through lots of difficult conditions and experiencing tricks played by many unhealthy industries, can still be influenced by cooked up official accounts. Finally, shrewd investors are used to casting doubt upon official numbers. This surely harms the credibility of the authorities concerned and is detrimental to their effectiveness in implementing policies.
Therefore, the government should not underestimate investors' intelligence and continually release fake numbers to prove the effectiveness of bailouts. For example, the MOF claimed that 60 percent of firms that have received bailouts regularly meet their interest payments.
But actually some of these industries are lured by bailout incentives and feign sickness. Once the government stops backing them, they have to face enormous pressure from banks. Then, in order to weather the storm, companies may have to sell parts of their assets. Since most of the industries receiving bailouts manage to sell their assets at a tortoise-like speed, we can take them as negative examples of such a bailout policy.
The dissemination of incorrect or incomplete information has become the source of so many problems in the financial market. The authorities concerned should play the role of a magic mirror and help investors distinguish good from bad in the market so as to facilitate capital flow and strengthen the financial market.
But if the government tries to conceal and distort the real information simply to create fictional numbers, rational investors will only become more distrustful of official figures and the market. This will only worsen the problem.
Lai Ping-yen is an associate professor in the Department of Financial Management at Da Yeh University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under