In order to stop the Bush administration from selling advanced weapons to Taiwan, China recently toned down its rhetoric against Taiwan, hinted at more flexibility in dealing with America's missile defense plans and warned of a possible arms race in the Taiwan Strait.
But can we trust Beijing's dictators, who only understand the language of brute force and neglect the real threat that they pose to Taiwan? China has 300 short-range missiles pointing across the Taiwan Strait and continues to deploy about 50 more a year.
To guarantee Taiwan's security America has to respond to and counter Beijing's aggression. China's tactic is to strike Taiwan quickly and over-whelmingly before America can respond. Its intention to bring Taiwan to its knees by force is very clear.
The Arleigh Burke destroyers that Taiwan seeks to buy are not cheap. They cost about US$1 billion each. But does Taiwan have any other choice as it faces a hostile China? It would be very costly for Taiwan to match China dollar for dollar. Obviously Taiwan needs to have a cost effective way of defending itself. President Chen Shui-bian
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Personal gain and politics
In January this year I said good-bye to a place where I had lived for more than 20 years, and moved back to Taiwan and readied myself for the hardship I might encounter.
Of course there are frustrations, such as the near impossibility of pushing my 14-month-old daughter in the baby cart for just a few blocks -- clear evidence of poor and inconsiderate city designs that ignore the needs of the handicapped and others. But I think I can live with these as long as efforts are made and improvements can be foreseen.
The most difficult and
painful part is politics. I have started to believe that the people of Taiwan need to see the truth concerning the unscrupulous politicians behind the nearsightedness of government policies and do something about it.
First, two career politicians, who did not even have the courtesy to shake hands with the newly-elected president and who regarded their election defeat as personal humiliation, have done tremendous damage not only to the fragile new government but also to the people of Taiwan in general, by opposing everything the government tries to do. Making personal gains in the political arena for the next presidential election outweigh their concern for the welfare of the people.
Then there are political clowns who turn the Legislative Yuan into a circus that has become a global laughingstock. It is said that this is simply a feature of politics in Taiwan and nothing to be surprised or alarmed at. But the prevalence of this absurdity is hurting Taiwan and the people of Taiwan.
If we keep on overlooking this, further damage will be an inevitable reality.
The KMT government did not treat this beautiful island as "home." Taiwan was only a hotel that accommodated their temporary needs. With such an attitude the government failed to construct a blueprint that benefited Taiwan.
I was then struck to learn, when the head of the KMT dug up the 10-year-old Guidelines for National Unification, that he remains nostalgic toward China. KMT legislators have passed short-sighted laws and policies, such as the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Plant
The Legislative Yuan is no place for politicians who set their sights on the other side of the Taiwan Strait and disregard the needs of the people of Taiwan. It's time for us to vent our anger through our ballots in the next election and to chase out the politicians who are there for their own profits. It is time for us to express our love for this island.
Jerry Wan
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry