The storm triggered by the comic book On Taiwan
Many commentators claim Yoshinori Kobayashi (小林善紀) is merely a cartoonist who cannot be linked to the mainstream Japanese society, while others said he has never done research on history, much less has any historical knowledge. One unifying trend in the criticism was that no matter what Kobayashi writes, it could be dismissed out-of-hand simply a superficial opinion.
Such comments may help the opinion-givers vent to their discontent, but what do they base their arguments on? They seem to believe that only historians have or can have in-depth historical viewpoints.
Who is qualified to judge whether or not Kobayashi is a marginalized and lonely right-winger? The commentators provided no statistics or explanations. However, one thing we do know is that his comic books have sold thousands of copies.
Amid this wave of debate, a renowned member of the Academia Sinica, based in the US, wrote an article, saying that those "Japan-loving Taiwanese," those "imperial citizens" (
However, he also quoted a Japanese professor as saying that these imperial citizens have neither been accepted by mainstream Japanese society nor do they understand the profundities of Japanese culture. But he cited the professor's opinion as evidence, without analyzing it to see if there was any national superiority complex or discrimination.
Everyone uses the term "mainstream Japanese society" and many people in Taipei are busy trying to stick labels on right-wingers like Kobayashi so they can sweep them into the basement and out of sight. But are such right-wingers really out of step with Japanese society?
Take some examples from the most influential political circles of Japan. In 1986, then minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Masayuki Fujio (藤尾正行) said that Japan's annexation of Korea was agreed upon by both sides and Korea was also responsible. When former justice minister Shigeto Nagano (永野茂門) took office in 1994, he said that the Sino-Japanese war was not an invasion and that the Nanking Massacre did not happen. Less than a year ago, Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori (森喜朗) said Japan is a godly nation centered around their mikados, or emperors. His viewpoint is identical with those in the era of pre-World War II militarism.
Of course, these right-wing views by high-ranking officials were immediately criticized and most of them were forced to resign to pacify objections made by Japan's neighbors. However, it is hard to deny that these people do not belong in the mainstream.
Japan's leftists and rightists have their own domains. For example, in the media, the Yomiuri Shimbun (讀賣新聞) is left-wing, and the Sankei Shimbun (產經新聞) is right-wing. Most of the senior industrial leaders lean toward the right. Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara (石原慎太郎) may one day become prime minister, but he still calls China "Sina" (支那), a derogatory name left over from the pre-World War II era.
We should present reasons when judging people or issues. We should not turn up our noses at someone's viewpoints simply because they are offensive to us. Even though right-wingers such as Kobayashi belong to a very marginal group, it does not constitute a reason for repudiating their standpoints. After all, mainstream views are not tantamount to truth, and who can figure out where Japan's mainstream is?
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with