While receiving exiled Chinese dissident Wei Jingsheng (
After the Republic of Ireland achieved its ultimate independence from the UK in 1949, problems relating to Northern Ireland became the key disputes between the two nations. There was conflict in Northern Ireland, as the fight between Roman Catholics and Protestants, and the dispute over who should govern the territory continued for decades.
The turning point came on April 10, 1998 when the UK and the Republic of Ireland jointly signed the Belfast Agreement (also known as the Good Friday Agreement) -- under which the British and the Irish agreed to rebuild their relations based on forgiveness, mutual trust and protection of human rights.
Both states also agreed to establish national human rights commissions as the fundamental institutions for protecting human rights.
On the one hand, the British government agreed to pass a law to establish the "Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission." To ensure that the commission would operate independently, the government passed the Northern Ireland Act 1998 -- in compliance with a commitment made in the Good Friday Agreement. The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission came into existence on March 1, 1999.
On the other hand, the Irish government also promised to fully protect human rights and to draft a bill of rights as well as to supplement the European Convention on Human Rights. The Irish government also vowed to maintain its own standards of human rights protection no lower than the standards of Northern Ireland, and to formally establish a human rights commission with equivalent authority and functions to the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission. The Irish government proposed a bill for a human rights commission to its parliament in February 1999 and the law was passed on May 31, 2000.
In the Good Friday Agreement, the British and Irish governments agreed that after their own rights commissions were formed, the two commissions would further establish a joint committee as a formal institution for protecting the rights of all Irish. Meanwhile, the two commissions might come up with a human rights charter to promote basic rights.
Thus, the British and the Irish have chosen to resolve political disputes, jurisdiction issues and religious conflicts democratically and peacefully, through the Good Friday Agreement. Their idea of establishing human rights commissions together to promote human rights and to ease cross-border conflicts is worth studying.
As far as the cross-strait situation is concerned, first, Taiwan should establish a national human rights commission which complies with the requirements of the UN's "Paris Principles."
Second, Taiwan can learn from the British and the Irish example and seek assistance from the international community in order to reach a joint agreement with Beijing in maintaining peace and human rights.
Third, the US government is planning to move a motion at the UN Commission on Human Rights to condemn China's human rights abuses. Due to external pressure, the Chinese authorities recently agreed to sign an international agreement to promote economic, cultural and social rights, which bodes well for the possibility of establishing a cross-strait human rights commission or a cross-strait human rights international forum in the future.
Since there is an international trend towards the protection of human rights, it should be realized both in Taiwan and in China.
It is to be hoped that both sides of the Strait will abide by the Paris Principles to establish their rights commissions in order to thoroughly practice human rights protection. Meanwhile, both sides should try to reach a peace agreement similar to the Good Friday Agreement in order to uphold peace and human rights.
Liao Fu-te is an assistant research fellow of the Institute of European and American Studies at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations