Is the Ministry of the Interior's decision to bar Yoshinori Kobayashi (小林善紀) -- author of the controversial Japanese comic book On Taiwan (台灣論) -- from entering Taiwan a violation of human rights? Does the government have to grant permission to all foreigners who wish to visit the island? Is the government really "backtracking on democratic politics" (開民主政治的倒車) and violating human rights by making the decision? Does the government have the obligation or the capacity to protect the human rights of all local residents, both the ROC nationals and foreigners, who obey the law and pay taxes here? Does this obligation extend to cover nationals who do not even reside in Taiwan?
In fact, the UN has never requested its member countries to issue visas to all foreigners -- just as we don't necessarily have to allow all visitors who ring the doorbell to come into our houses. Whether or not Kobayashi really loves Taiwan as he claims, his status as a "foreigner" to Taiwan is unquestionable. The interior ministry had called a review committee, consisting of representatives from relevant government agencies, to decide on whether Kobayashi should be barred from entering the country under Article 17 of the Immigration Law (
Take the US for example. The US frequently imposes economic sanctions on other nations to compel them into improving their human rights conditions. However, even the US government has a criteria upon which decisions on the issueing of entry visas to foreigners are based. Like all other foreigners, Taiwanese intending to enter the US for travel or study must first be interviewed by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT, 美國在台協會). There is no guarantee that everyone who presents all the requisite documents such as financial statements will receive an entry visa. Meanwhile, no explanation is offered when visa denials are made by the US government. Many people have mistakenly thought that the US government, the supposed defender of human rights, would treat everyone equally with no discrimination whatsoever. That is not the case. Based on the considerations regarding social order and national interests, the US government clearly specifies on its visa application form that no Nazi party member is welcome in the nation. The government also frequently denies foreigners' visa applications or even expels foreigners who might threaten its national interests.
The ban on Kobayashi's entry was a decision made by government agencies through a legal procedure. If a re-evaluation is necessary, it must be done in line with the legal procedure as well. Kobayashi has to request a re-evaluation of the decision. Kobayashi's statement about his love for Taiwan does not automatically qualify him for entry. Otherwise, why were former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) visa applications repeatedly refused by the Japanese government. Why don't King, Huang Erh-hsuan and Lee Sheng-hsiung hold a press conference to demand an apology by the Japanese government for that refusal?
Sandy Yeh is the director of Continuing Education and Training Center at Central Police University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under