The never ending notion that Taiwan will cede its sovereignty to Beijing is alarming when advanced by former US State Department officials like Stanley Roth.
The concept of any 50 year agreement with Beijing is an erosion of the national security of both Taiwan and the US. It is even more alarming that Roth's remaining associates in the State Department have taken the opportunity to officially invoke the Free Compact of Association over the "routine" visit to the Marshall Islands by the Taiwan navy. Roth was very deeply involved in the treaty negotiations with the now independent countries concerned.
The recent and unprecedented denial by State Department officials is clearly an official action which is subject to further scrutiny by the US Congress. Even after the Cold War, the strategic defense of the Western Pacific is essential to the national interest of the US as it negotiates its collective security arrangements.
Concurring, Stanley Roth once testified to Congress: "The question of strategic denial has changed a bit, but I would argue, and I think my Defense Department colleague will argue even more strongly, has not vanished. While there is no navy comparable to the Russian navy today in the Pacific, I would not want to stake my career that there will never be one. The ability to have strategic denial for such a large region has to be important as we think about the future and into the next century. So strategic denial, if not as urgent as during the Cold War, is still a very real interest."(p.30, Joint Oversight Hearing on the Compacts of Free Association with the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, and Palau. Oct 1, 1998, Washington, DC).
Since the recent departure of Stanley Roth from federal employment, he and his fellow retirees have continued to act with a collusive air of public office as they often pressure President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to negotiate away the sovereignty of Taiwan in accordance with their blue prints for 50 year agreements. Is this a form of private foreign policy? I look forward to Roth's sworn testimony before Congress on this issue.
Jeff Geer
Las Vegas
Inciting rape
I write in response to the letters from Cyndi Lai and Shirley Lin (Feb. 16, page 12).
While I can agree with them, I think the issue that needs to be addressed is "what causes a person to be raped?" Females are most common among rape victims, but some men do get raped by men, and women at times too.
When I was in Taiwan recently, the behavior of both local men and women was frankly shocking. This should be a cause for concern in a society like Taiwan, which proclaims itself to be rather conservative. Vulgar social behavior is very common among women, especially teenage girls. Drinking habits among women are rather unhealthy in a "conservative" society like Taiwan.
Social behavior is one of the important reasons why rape cases are on the rise, and, surprisingly, occurring among friends. The chances of a woman being raped by a strange man are relatively slim. I do not think rape occurs because of the urge to commit rape. It is more due to how a woman presents herself and behaves toward the opposite sex. A seductive provocation and behavior will definitely invite rape.
Of course it is sad for a rape victim to have to suffer further torment and embarrassment. But it is still not right to make men bear all the responsibility, when women fail to carry and present themselves properly in the presence of the opposite sex.
Michael Teo
Singapore
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry