The Presidential Office spent yesterday trying to explain that initial reports that Chen Shui-bian
The interim agreement idea, originally thought up by Kenneth Lieberthal of the University of Michigan, aims to allay the fears of both sides of the Taiwan Strait and create an environment of peaceful cooperation leading up to eventual negotiations on unification. Specifically, China was to renounce the threat of force against Taiwan while Taiwan gave assurances that it would not declare independence. The two sides were then to retain autonomy over their own domestic and foreign affairs while working on building a relationship with each other for 50 years, at the end of which they were to sit down together and open negotiations on unification. The basic idea was that the each side would renounce the action that most worried the other side -- these were the "interim agreements" from which a relationship could be built leading to the kind of trust that could enable unification talks to take place.
The Presidential Office spent most of yesterday trying to explain that what was originally reported -- alarmingly -- as Chen's endorsement of this idea was in fact merely the president's agreeing that a long-term process of confidence building cooperation would be a good idea.
Maybe it would, but the price of erecting the political structure within which this kind of cooperation could take place is, in the Lieberthal model, the sacrifice of Taiwan's sovereignty.
Frankly, the interim agreement model is an excellent one if unification is your eventual goal -- which is, no doubt, why it has been adopted, although without credit being given to its author, by James Soong
Polls routinely show that 60 percent of Taiwanese seek no change in the status quo while around 20 percent want formal independence. Since the status quo is de facto independence, we might interpret this as showing as many as 80 percent of Taiwanese are opposed to renunciation of sovereignty.
Perhaps Roth, Leiberthal and company might ask whether this 80 percent or so would remain so opposed if sovereignty was the price of peace. To which our reply can only be to ask what could be the value of a peace that was actually the result of a cave-in to the threat of war. And that really is what is wrong with the interim agreement's idea.
Once you admit that Taiwanese do not necessarily seek unification, then reaching the kind of agreement proposed can only be seen as rewarding China for its intransigence over the use of military force.
The reason we don't like to see Chen endorsing the interim agreement idea in any way is simple: It is intrinsic to the idea that sovereignty is something that Taiwan will eventually renounce. For the president to speak favorably of any part of the plan is to run the risk that he looks on sovereignty as something which is negotiable. That, given the current appalling reality of the regime across the Taiwan Strait, is something that is simply not the case. It is simply irresponsible to say or do anything that might suggest otherwise.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry