THE RESIDENTS OF Kungliao, the little coastal town 40km from Taipei where the on-again off-again nuclear plant project remains in suspense, can take heart. The cat is out of the bag: Nuclear energy is not cheap, it's not safe, and it's no solution to Taiwan's long-term energy needs.
This much is now acknowledged across the political spectrum. Meanwhile, the longer the issue is allowed to paralyze the machinery of the state, the more the public takes note of what the debate is about. And with nuclear energy there's one infallible rule: the more people know about it, the less they want anything to do with it.
Just a generation ago, populations all over the world were prepared to give governments the benefit of the doubt regarding nuclear energy. They accepted, more or less, what the scientists and industrialists and bureaucrats and politicians told them about the wondrous, clean, low-cost energy resource that would lead them into a bright, unpolluted future with almost inexhaustible supplies of power. Opponents were dismissed as cranks, hippies and subversives.
Revelations
But in due course, all that changed. In the US, it changed with Three Mile Island; in Europe with Chernobyl. It has changed recently in Japan with revelations of nuclear blunders that have been covered up over the decades, and it's changing now in Taiwan. It changed as the numbers of those who fell victim to radiation spills and experiments began to mount up. It changed once it became apparent to government, to big business, and to the banks and insurers who underwrite the power industry, that the supposed economic benefits were non-existent once the true costs of building, running and decommissioning nuclear plants were factored in -- not to mention the impossibility of making the lethally contaminated leftovers disappear.
Coming into the light
So long as you keep people in the dark about what's at stake, it's relatively easy to persuade them that nuclear energy is the only guarantee of a future power supply, and by extension of national stability and prosperity. But once the topic becomes the focus of national debate, illuminated by the massed spotlights of media interest and public concern, there's only one way for the tide to turn -- against nuclear energy.
There never has been an example of more discussion and awareness translating into more public support for nuclear energy, and there's no reason why Taiwan should be the first exception.
`Not our fault'
Taipower (
State of neglect
Meanwhile, national energy policy has been allowed to fall into a shocking state of neglect. As shown by the extraordinary island wide blackout of July 1999 (triggered by the failure of a single pylon) and the frequent outages that still shut down production at Hsinchu Science-based Park (
The whole sector needs a radical shake-up: new blood and new ideas, plus integrated policies for reduced consumption, increased efficiency, and diversified power production. What it doesn't need is another facility drawing on the most dangerous, discredited energy source known to man.
Turning point
In the future, when people look back on this critical moment -- the turning point for nuclear energy in Taiwan -- it is possible that they will remember above all the historic session of the Legislative Yuan on Jan. 31, when 135 of Taiwan's finest voted to resuscitate the island's moribund nuclear energy program.
That gloriously blinkered decision was the last, sad hurrah of Taiwan's nuclear-industrial complex, and will probably turn out to have been the opposition parties' last bungled chance of rescuing their reputations in time for upcoming elections.
By concentrating on the nuclear power issue at the expense of everything else, exploiting it to foment what they would like to believe is a popular backlash against a weak government, the opposition alliance has well and truly shot itself in the foot -- full-bore, double-barrel.
Perhaps they can't quite bring themselves to look at the bloodied stump dangling below their knee. But eventually they'll have to. And when the pain kicks in, when they realize how venal they appear in the eyes of much of the electorate, there are going to be some extraordinary contortions -- as parties and lawmakers scramble to disassociate themselves from both the pro-nuclear vote and the impending electoral debacle.
A monument to `entrenched interests'
The residents of Kungliao should know that history is on their side; it's the opposition legislators who will be the big losers. I would like to suggest, therefore, that the residents commemorate this triumph by erecting a splendid monument, in black and gold, to those valiant defenders of entrenched interests, the 135 relics of the ancient regime who were so obsessed with face and immediate political gain that they completely and utterly missed the tide of the times.
Every one of them deserves to have their name carved in stone at the site of the plant, so that they may be linked in perpetuity with the monolithic remains of nuclear energy in Taiwan.
We already know that a nuclear power plant will never again be commissioned for these shores, and we can be 90 percent certain that the Kungliao plant, even if completed, will never be used. The coming elections will see to that. Instead, the plant will stand as one of the last great follies of the KMT era, a multibillion dollar monument to the "face" of Lien Chan(連戰) and the "edifice complex" of his party.
Let's hope that as a result of this costly blunder, all political groupings in Taiwan will learn to put the public interest first -- even when it contradicts their own grandiose image of themselves.
Christopher MacDonald is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs