Has President Chen Shui-bian
All issues have become as polarized as black and white, simplified into "true or false" questions. One can only be for or against the power plant. Compromises, gray areas, or any third possible answers are out of the question.
The DPP charter contains many articles with which Chen must comply in addition to the article on nuclear energy. Chen's previous opposition to construction of the plant could arguably be deemed as breaching such articles, so why hasn't anyone made that point? It is not, indeed, the only point that could be made to demonstrate the absurdity of the question.
Article 2 states that "a democratic free country should ... be established in accordance with the free will of a majority of the people..." As polls uniformly indicate that most people, not to mention a legislative majority, support plant construction, had Chen continued to oppose construction, he would have been acting against the will of the majority.
The same article also states that the government must govern in accordance with the law. As the Council of Grand Justices has ruled that the construction halt was "procedurally flawed," refusal to resume construction would not be "governing in accordance with the law." Chen would have been in breach of the DPP charter.
Article 3 mandates the pursuit of economic growth and the promotion of employment opportunities. As the halt to construction has devastated our economy, Chen would be in breach of the DPP charter if he continued to block construction.
The article on nuclear energy mandates "opposition to newly constructed nuclear power generators, active exploration of substitute energy, and closure of all existing nuclear power plants within a period of time." Com-mon sense dictates that successful exploration of substitute energy must come first. But Taiwan has failed miserably in that regard so far.
The harsh reality is that we badly need electricity for virtually every aspect of our daily life. The DPP has promised an adequate supply of substitute energy for only the next five to six years. Most people are not convinced, however, and businesses need to plan decades ahead.
In addition, most of the private power plants (supposedly our main substitute energy source) are not up and running due to protests led by local government heads, most of whom are DPP members. Shouldn't Chen be doing something about ensuring we have such alternatives first before scrapping the new plant? Otherwise, he would not be acting in compliance with the charter.
The article also talks of closing existing nuclear power plants. Chen would be complying with the charter by first closing the first three nuclear power plants, as they pose more security risks and produce more types of pollution than the fourth plant.
People should stop focusing their entire consciousness on the single issue of the plant. The pros and cons of nuclear energy are much more complex. It is unfair and shallow to judge people as supporters of nuclear energy, and traitors of the DPP, the Taiwanese, or mankind generally for that matter, just because they support construction of the plant.
How can anyone say that Chen has betrayed the DPP when "a nuclear-free homeland" is now the general consensus?
Last but not least, as president, Chen is leader of this country before he is a DPP member. His duty to all of us, not that to the DPP, comes first.
Wu Yi-ju is an attorney.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.