South Korea and Taiwan both began national policies of development and reconstruction after World War II. As a result of similar development paths and models, they have become the inspiration for comparative research by scholars while their accomplishments have received wide international recognition.
For example, South Korean development is unique in that it thrives on a "culture of hate." Taiwan's vitality also has a unique nature -- "colonial dynamics," which was essentially a counterattack against foreign subjugation.
The hatred of the Koreans is the product of both foreign enemies and domestic struggles. It has emerged as a collective social consciousness, driving individual and national accomplishments and leading the nation out of poverty, humiliation and insecurity. This collective consciousness was the main propellent of South Korea's progress.
Facing enormous pressure from China, as well as decades of suppression by strongman politics, the Taiwanese have countered with pragmatism and flexibility, producing fascinating momentum for growth under stress.
The unique developments in South Korea and Taiwan prove the validity of the saying "countries without enemies and external threats would remain ruinous"
So perhaps without its mighty enemy across the Strait and without a half century of oppression by the KMT, Taiwan would never have accomplished the economic and democratic developments the benefits of which we enjoy today. It is ironic to think that the people of Taiwan have the Chinese Communist Party and the KMT -- whose influence would generally be thought of as malign -- to thank for playing their respective roles of external threat and internal enemy so adroitly, providing the Taiwanese with the momentum and motivation for development.
And the irony deepens when one considers how, after last year's peaceful transfer of power in Taiwan, the momentum for growth began to vanish. In the past eight months, the Chen Shui-bian
From an economic standpoint, Taiwan's society is so rich that people believe that "wealth is king." People have forgotten how hard-working and thrifty we once were. Even more, people no longer know the meaning of politeness and humility.
Facing the beginning of the 21st century and the start of the Year of the Snake, a thought-provoking question for the people of Taiwan is: What should we do, now that we have lost our "colonial dynamics?" Do we have any new enemies to resist? Do we have any new values to pursue?
Of course China remains an enormous threat. The people of Taiwan shouldn't drop their guard simply because of the opening of the "small three links"
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing