As the Chinese New Year approaches, Taiwan is filled with the joy of celebrating the arrival of the Year of the Snake. Traditionally the lunar new year is a time for family reunions, wishes for a new beginning and a brighter future. So what new beginning or brighter future should we wish for?
Looking back at the months since President Chen Shui-bian
We can only hope that both the ruling and opposition parties will use the long holiday this year to reflect on and rectify their mistakes. The KMT has to stop dwelling on its election defeat and act like a responsible opposition party rather than a bunch of spoiled and disgruntled children, while Chen and the DPP have to recognize the political reality of being a minority government and work harder to coordinate and communicate with the opposition parties. More people voted against Chen than voted for him. As a result the DPP needs to jettison pet ideologies and cleave to the political middle ground. It cannot complain of not being allowed to govern when it pursues policies for which it has failed to get any bipartisan or popular support. On the other hand the opposition, especially the KMT, has to realize that they did lose the election. The country needs government and according to the Constitution it is the DPP which sits in the driving seat. Trying to recover power by constitutional manipulation shows a lack of respect for the voters, for the electoral process and Taiwan's democratic processes. The KMT should stop plotting constitutional coups and start working out how to win an election.
The Executive Yuan's decision to scrap the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant last October triggered almost unprecedented political dislocation which led to an erosion of confidence. Frankly, the Council of Grand Justices' interpretation of the Constitution on Jan. 15 was an appalling mess, a politically-inspired fudge which rather than solving the problem merely laid out paths for both sides to follow to further standoffs. The fact is that this issue can only be successfully resolved by some kind of compromise, but the DPP and the KMT, the main protagonists in this long-running conflict, are as far apart as ever. Once again, ideological zealotry is getting in the way of making government work.
Internationally, the US presidential election has been thought-provoking as far as Taiwan's politics are concerned. It was one of the most controversial elections the US has seen. Had the situation occurred in Taiwan, things probably would not have ended so peacefully. When the Supreme Court finally spoke, we saw Al Gore putting the national interest before his own and conceding defeat. In preparing for the transition, we saw George W. Bush taking pains to eliminate partisan fractures and unite the country. The maturity of US democracy serves as a useful role model for Taiwan.
Traditionally, the advent of a new lunar year brings with it a thorough housecleaning, with the tossing out of old, broken and no longer needed items. Let us hope that Taiwan's political parties will do some housecleaning of their own, tossing out their grudges and political disputes so that when life gets back to normal after the holidays, we will see a new era of bipartisanship and sound government.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under