Previously suppressed social forces were released when Taiwanese society shed its totalitarian bondage and moved into a new democracy. Emerging diversity immediately brought turbulence, as forces pressed for democratic reforms and existing special interest groups instantly began fighting. Explosive political struggles are taking place constantly, especially in the legislature.
In this stormy era, ethnic divisions and the sudden halting of economic growth are threats to the newly installed democratic system. These are closely related to the political chaos and economic depression facing our country. The issue of national identity is related to ethnic tension. In each election, ethnic issues more or less effect different groups of voters. After the new administration stepped in, our country's economic growth nosedived, creating panic and complaints. Several major proposals for political reform are facing resistance from special interest groups, which is making democratic reform extremely difficult. People are waiting for the full benefits of the new democracy.
Take the controversy over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, for example. Had the new administration been more flexible and opted for a public referendum, then there never would have been a motion for a presidential recall. There never would have been the soap opera over whether to recall the president and vice president at the same time, either. We would not now have to debate about whether to cast a vote of no-confidence against the premier. Since we are a democratic country that follows the rule of law, the legitimacy of the government naturally comes from the popular majority's support for the government's policies. However, no one seems to know whether the popular majority supports the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant or not. The legislative majority KMT thinks it represents the popular majority in requesting an immediate resumption of construction. The Presidential Office and the Executive Yuan believe that as their opposition to the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant was a campaign promise and that they are supported by popular will. When will such debates ever end? Why not just hold a public referendum to end all the controversy?
The government remains unwilling to hold public referenda on major policy issues, yet many dubious "opinion polls" have been conducted. From the electronic media to the printed media, everyone is joining in the craze. Virtually everyone has a poll to show that they are firmly in touch with what is "newsworthy." However, the design of an accurate poll is money, time, and energy consuming. Interviewing is an even greater task. Undertaken without care, we easily end up with deceptive poll results. In the end, those suffering the most from such poorly-designed polls may very well be the individuals and organizations that conduct the polls.
Pathetically, a significant number of Taiwanese politicians have repeatedly resorted to such disreputable polls for self-promotion, further misleading the public and living out the maxim that "politics is the highest form of trickeries."
Democracy in Taiwan is not yet secure. The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant controversy deriving from the change of power between the new and old governments has hurt both the opposition and the ruling party. We really don't need polls fabricated in the name of academic studies. And we don't need ludicrous politicians to make groundless accusations based on phony records. It is unwise to pour salt on an open wound.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs