While the KMT has made numerous attempts recently to entice back some of its wayward members, as well as to distant itself from the so-called "Lee Teng-hui line,"(
During the last presidential election, Lien Chan (
To what degree have the KMT's enterprises caused Taiwan's political and economic structure to deteriorate? The KMT is the only political party in Taiwan that owns and runs a huge business empire. It is also the richest political party in the world. Possession of the assets in itself may not be a sin, but there are many questions surrounding the way these assets were acquired. They involved, for instance, the illegal transfer of money, property or commercial interests from the party to the government or vice versa.
When the KMT moved to Taiwan in 1949 it had only one party-owned enterprise and less than US$1 million in cash. But after nearly 55 years ruling Taiwan, the KMT now owns seven stock-holding companies, 27 party-owned enterprises and more than 400 party-invested companies. The value of the KMT's assets is estimated to be between US$6 billion and US$15 billion.
How did the party accumulate these assets? First, the party simply took over the properties formerly owned by the Japanese government during the colonial period or purchased these assets at artificially low prices. In later years it benefited from the symbiosis between the government, the source of lucrative development contracts, and KMT companies, the recipient of such contracts. Furthermore, it has used its own financial power, along with its connections as the former government, to manipulate Taiwan's financial markets via insider trading and rumor-mongering accomplished through the media. It is ironic that in its government role, the KMT stresses financial market stability, whereas in its business dealings the KMT generates market instability -- sudden rises, sudden plunges -- through which it can earn huge profits as well as launder payouts for various favors.
What are the major implications of the KMT's possessing such vast wealth? For a start, it creates an unequal base for party competition. Since the KMT owns a far higher proportion of political and economic resources than other parties, it is easy for it to use its financial power to engage in illegal activities such as vote-buying. Also, the KMT's business empire undermines Taiwan's political and economic base by enabling "crony capitalism," the corrupt collusion between government, party and local factions. Taiwan's black gold politics is entirely the product of the KMT's 55-year ownership of party-run-businesses.
Lien's statements regarding putting the party assets into trust, however, forced the party to face an issue that must be dealt with if it is to regain power. To win back the public's trust, the KMT must seriously push for the enactment of so called "sunshine laws" -- a legislative package including the Trust Enterprise Law, the Political Contributions Management Law and the Political Party Law. It will probably take years for the KMT to divest itself of its assets. To start with, an independent task force should be established to examine the sources and contents of the KMT's assets. Then we will know the extent to which the KMT, during its many years of impunity, has pilfered the people.
It's been nearly nine months since the KMT became the opposition party in Taiwan. It seems that the party's central leadership still does not accept its defeat in the presidential election and has refused to implement party reform. It's obvious that the key members of the party's central headquarters are only interested in accusing others rather than taking responsibility for losing the election. There is still a lack of consensus about how to use the party's resources to reform the party's structure.
Elections often prompt politicians to make promises which they can't fulfil. While accusing President Chen Shui-bian (
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,