While the KMT has made numerous attempts recently to entice back some of its wayward members, as well as to distant itself from the so-called "Lee Teng-hui line,"(
During the last presidential election, Lien Chan (
To what degree have the KMT's enterprises caused Taiwan's political and economic structure to deteriorate? The KMT is the only political party in Taiwan that owns and runs a huge business empire. It is also the richest political party in the world. Possession of the assets in itself may not be a sin, but there are many questions surrounding the way these assets were acquired. They involved, for instance, the illegal transfer of money, property or commercial interests from the party to the government or vice versa.
When the KMT moved to Taiwan in 1949 it had only one party-owned enterprise and less than US$1 million in cash. But after nearly 55 years ruling Taiwan, the KMT now owns seven stock-holding companies, 27 party-owned enterprises and more than 400 party-invested companies. The value of the KMT's assets is estimated to be between US$6 billion and US$15 billion.
How did the party accumulate these assets? First, the party simply took over the properties formerly owned by the Japanese government during the colonial period or purchased these assets at artificially low prices. In later years it benefited from the symbiosis between the government, the source of lucrative development contracts, and KMT companies, the recipient of such contracts. Furthermore, it has used its own financial power, along with its connections as the former government, to manipulate Taiwan's financial markets via insider trading and rumor-mongering accomplished through the media. It is ironic that in its government role, the KMT stresses financial market stability, whereas in its business dealings the KMT generates market instability -- sudden rises, sudden plunges -- through which it can earn huge profits as well as launder payouts for various favors.
What are the major implications of the KMT's possessing such vast wealth? For a start, it creates an unequal base for party competition. Since the KMT owns a far higher proportion of political and economic resources than other parties, it is easy for it to use its financial power to engage in illegal activities such as vote-buying. Also, the KMT's business empire undermines Taiwan's political and economic base by enabling "crony capitalism," the corrupt collusion between government, party and local factions. Taiwan's black gold politics is entirely the product of the KMT's 55-year ownership of party-run-businesses.
Lien's statements regarding putting the party assets into trust, however, forced the party to face an issue that must be dealt with if it is to regain power. To win back the public's trust, the KMT must seriously push for the enactment of so called "sunshine laws" -- a legislative package including the Trust Enterprise Law, the Political Contributions Management Law and the Political Party Law. It will probably take years for the KMT to divest itself of its assets. To start with, an independent task force should be established to examine the sources and contents of the KMT's assets. Then we will know the extent to which the KMT, during its many years of impunity, has pilfered the people.
It's been nearly nine months since the KMT became the opposition party in Taiwan. It seems that the party's central leadership still does not accept its defeat in the presidential election and has refused to implement party reform. It's obvious that the key members of the party's central headquarters are only interested in accusing others rather than taking responsibility for losing the election. There is still a lack of consensus about how to use the party's resources to reform the party's structure.
Elections often prompt politicians to make promises which they can't fulfil. While accusing President Chen Shui-bian (
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry