In the 11 years since the 1989 Tiananmen Square Incident caused a media uproar in the West, related issues have received serious attention in the mainstream Western media on only two occasions. One was in 1995 when the media reported that Chai Ling
The first is the historical level. Since the Tiananmen democracy movement broke out, a large volume of writings, including related memoirs and analytical essays, has appeared. The only major gap has been that of official Chinese government documents. The book has somewhat made up for this. It is a positive contribution to our overall understanding of the 1989 democracy move-ment. As far as the content of the documents is concerned, how-ever, there is little new, behind-the-scenes information. Generally speaking, such things that the documents do reveal -- for instance, Zhao Ziyang (趙紫陽) advocating the promotion of democracy, Li Peng (李鵬) and Wang Zhen (王震) arguing firmly for the use of military force to suppress the movement, and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) fearing that he would be put under house arrest -- were all more or less perceived at the time. So now we simply have further confirmation. Thus, on this level, the papers aren't really ground-breaking in nature.
But what has really concerned the media is the significance of the book on the pragmatic level. One might refer to it as the "The Tiananmen Papers' phenomenon." This phenomenon reflects the following facts:
First, the documents in the book are highly classified. They could not have been obtained and compiled by low-level officials nor a single person. This proves that a serious split exists within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Whoever arranged the exposure of these documents may come from one of three groups. The first is the Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦) and Zhao Ziyang faction, which is losing influence; the second is the children of senior policy- makers; and the third is the reform faction at the upper levels of the party. Regardless of who is pulling the strings, their actions reflect the fact that the third-generation leadership collective, with Jiang Zemin (江澤民) at its nucleus, does not enjoy unshakable authority within the party and is unable completely to control the domestic political situation.
Second, the process by which this book was published is a tightly guarded secret. The author used the pen name "Zhang Liang" (張良) and concealed his face when being interviewed by Mike Wallace of the US TV network CBS. However, given the Chinese government's high level of criminal reconnaissance expertise, the small circle of people who had contact with the documents, and the fact that "Zhang Liang" revealed his accent when he was interviewed, it would not be difficult for the government to find out who is responsible or at least who might have divulged the classified information. What is worth noting is that "Zhang" and those behind him must have considered the possibility of being discovered, but they still decided to go ahead. Obviously they have someone backing them. This clearly indicates that the intensity of the internal power struggle going on in the Chinese government far exceeds what the
outside world imagines.
Third, the appearance of the "The Tiananmen Papers phenomenon" at this time is clearly not coincidental. "Zhang" could not have obtained these documents only last year. There are grounds to conjecture that a group of people within the party have put forward these documents at this time to throw a political bomb in the direction of the meetings of the CCP's 16th Central Committee. They hope to use the problem of the Tiananmen Incident as a channel to raise the issue of political reform and ultimately influence the membership and even the agenda of the 16th Central Committee's meetings.
From this we can see that although the incident took place nearly 12 years ago, it is still an extremely important indicator of China's political development. The Tiananmen Incident has not faded from memory. On the contrary, following political developments, it will become a focus of people's concern to a greater and greater extent.
Wang Dan was a student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations in Beijing. He is currently a graduate student at Harvard University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs