In the 11 years since the 1989 Tiananmen Square Incident caused a media uproar in the West, related issues have received serious attention in the mainstream Western media on only two occasions. One was in 1995 when the media reported that Chai Ling
The first is the historical level. Since the Tiananmen democracy movement broke out, a large volume of writings, including related memoirs and analytical essays, has appeared. The only major gap has been that of official Chinese government documents. The book has somewhat made up for this. It is a positive contribution to our overall understanding of the 1989 democracy move-ment. As far as the content of the documents is concerned, how-ever, there is little new, behind-the-scenes information. Generally speaking, such things that the documents do reveal -- for instance, Zhao Ziyang (趙紫陽) advocating the promotion of democracy, Li Peng (李鵬) and Wang Zhen (王震) arguing firmly for the use of military force to suppress the movement, and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) fearing that he would be put under house arrest -- were all more or less perceived at the time. So now we simply have further confirmation. Thus, on this level, the papers aren't really ground-breaking in nature.
But what has really concerned the media is the significance of the book on the pragmatic level. One might refer to it as the "The Tiananmen Papers' phenomenon." This phenomenon reflects the following facts:
First, the documents in the book are highly classified. They could not have been obtained and compiled by low-level officials nor a single person. This proves that a serious split exists within the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Whoever arranged the exposure of these documents may come from one of three groups. The first is the Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦) and Zhao Ziyang faction, which is losing influence; the second is the children of senior policy- makers; and the third is the reform faction at the upper levels of the party. Regardless of who is pulling the strings, their actions reflect the fact that the third-generation leadership collective, with Jiang Zemin (江澤民) at its nucleus, does not enjoy unshakable authority within the party and is unable completely to control the domestic political situation.
Second, the process by which this book was published is a tightly guarded secret. The author used the pen name "Zhang Liang" (張良) and concealed his face when being interviewed by Mike Wallace of the US TV network CBS. However, given the Chinese government's high level of criminal reconnaissance expertise, the small circle of people who had contact with the documents, and the fact that "Zhang Liang" revealed his accent when he was interviewed, it would not be difficult for the government to find out who is responsible or at least who might have divulged the classified information. What is worth noting is that "Zhang" and those behind him must have considered the possibility of being discovered, but they still decided to go ahead. Obviously they have someone backing them. This clearly indicates that the intensity of the internal power struggle going on in the Chinese government far exceeds what the
outside world imagines.
Third, the appearance of the "The Tiananmen Papers phenomenon" at this time is clearly not coincidental. "Zhang" could not have obtained these documents only last year. There are grounds to conjecture that a group of people within the party have put forward these documents at this time to throw a political bomb in the direction of the meetings of the CCP's 16th Central Committee. They hope to use the problem of the Tiananmen Incident as a channel to raise the issue of political reform and ultimately influence the membership and even the agenda of the 16th Central Committee's meetings.
From this we can see that although the incident took place nearly 12 years ago, it is still an extremely important indicator of China's political development. The Tiananmen Incident has not faded from memory. On the contrary, following political developments, it will become a focus of people's concern to a greater and greater extent.
Wang Dan was a student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations in Beijing. He is currently a graduate student at Harvard University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry