The government hosted a National Economic Development Conference over the weekend and brought together industry, officialdom and academia to diagnose and heal Taiwan's economic woes. But the process of the conference and its conclusions reached therein -- as well as the possibilities of implementing them -- gives no cause for optimism. The TAIEX fell by 107 points yesterday, a clear indication that investors did not see a promising result from the conference.
The economic conference was meant to be an opportunity for conciliation between the political parties -- and for partisan cooperation in revitalizing the economy. But the government announced its decision to scrap the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant immediately after the Lien-Chen meeting. The atmosphere of partisan cooperation gave way to partisan conflict. The KMT's and PFP's boycott of the economic conference is a sign that they may continue to oppose the implementation of conclusions reached at the conference.
Since it took power in March, the DPP government has held several major financial and economic conferences, including one on taxation and another on knowledge-based economy. But we have not seen any concrete results from these two conferences. That was why "Oh! Yet another conference!" was the first thought that came to mind when one heard the news about the latest one.
Despite the boycott by opposition parties, lukewarm participation by industry, complex topical discussions and a paucity of consensus, the conference still managed to come up with some conclusions. A few of them were: to simplify the corporate merger process, ease restrictions on investments in China, encourage local governments to attract investments, and to shorten the review procedure for major investment and development projects.
As evident at the conference, both business circles and scholars are expecting the government to loosen the "no haste, be patient" policy. At a sensitive time for cross-strait relations, we believe the government should carefully evaluate this issue. Specifically, it may not be appropriate to open up the high-tech sectors recklessly, given Taiwan's reliance on them and global strategic considerations.
Even when loosening restrictions on investment in China, Taiwan should pursue a spirit of "effective management" and keep the R&D, management and financial departments of Taiwanese businesses in the country.
Even though the government had earlier stressed a knowledge-based economy as a key area for economic development, we did not see any focused discussion in this area during the conference. The government's definition of infrastructure construction remained limited to utilities and road construction. It has not extended to the foundation of a knowledge-based economy, such as fiberoptic networks and satellite channels. This wrong focus may cause the development of Taiwan's knowledge-based economy to lag even farther behind.
The results of the conference have shown that the country's fundamental economic and political conditions will not change any time soon. What the government can do now is to work on administrative measures and improve efficiency -- tasks that do not require legislation or amendments. After letting society feel its sincere wish to salvage the economy, the government can then force the opposition to cooperate. We would also like to remind the opposition parties that we are all on the same boat called Taiwan. Beijing stands to benefit the most if the political parties are not able to pull together and cooperate to revitalize the economy.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and