"Let us resolve to be masters, not the victims, of our history, controlling our own destiny without giving way to blind suspicions and emotions." \nThat line from American President John F. Kennedy seems very apt when considering what New Year's Resolutions Taiwan ought to make in the criminal justice and human rights arena. To achieve true change in the legal system, to place human rights and civil liberties on a firm foundation, our nation will have to be, as JFK said, masters of its own history without giving way to blind suspicions or emotions. That is a tall order for Taiwan. \nI would hope that over the next year our nation could carry through a set of resolutions that will mean something for human rights and civil liberties on our island. The first New Year's resolution I would hope for is an end to the death penalty. The death penalty is a medieval barbaric practice that serves no legitimate or rational end. It routinely sends both the guilty and the innocent to their deaths. It is time to end it. \nThe second New Year's resolution I would hope for is that the National Human Rights Commission gets the right people on its Board. By right people I mean tough, aggressive, informed advocates for human rights with the experience and the guts to do the job. I do not mean retired scholars, apologists or people whose only qualification is that the Legislative Yuan happens to owe them a favor. More than anything else, the board members of the National Human Rights Commission will make or break it. \nThe third New Year's resolution I would hope for is a set of constitutional amendments acting as a true bill of rights for Taiwan. This set of constitutional amendments could take as their model the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I do not advocate simply passing a set of statutes, which is what is being envisioned. \nThe fourth New Year's resolution I would hope for is an aggressive but fair approach to ridding this island of black gold politics and corruption. What this involves is tough prosecution and tough sentencing within the bounds of the law, without sacrificing civil liberties. Human rights and civil liberties are not some kind of ransom that a nation must pay in order to rid itself of corruption. You don't trade one for the other. Corruption can and should be fought while giving full support to civil liberties. \nThe fifth New Year's resolution I would hope for is for the legal community, including the Ministry of Justice, the Judicial Yuan and the Bar Associations to make a fundamental decision regarding what form of trial structure Taiwan is going to have. There was much talk several years ago regarding legal reform and modernization. As is the norm here, the talk went basically nowhere. \nThe direction that Taiwan's "reform" is headed now is toward unworkable hybrid created by a lack of direction and competing political interests. If we elect to keep the German system we currently have then we ought to modernize it and bring it in line with the current German system. \nIf we intend to adopt an Anglo-American type system then there needs to be clear agreement on that and a definite, practical plan towards that end. Two metaphors come to mind when considering the current state of legal reform in Taiwan: "dead in the water" and "lost in the woods." Both are accurate. \nThe ultimate resolution that I would hope for is that those people, parties and agencies in a position to make changes resolve to be long on action and short on rhetoric. \nBrian Kennedy is an attorney who writes and teaches on criminal justice and human rights issues.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse. Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China. Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation. Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors;